|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Minority Report
|
Will Morrow
Film Handler
Posts: 91
From: Mt. Pleasant, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 06-21-2002 02:15 PM
Finally. A movie that makes me proud to be a projectionist. All are entitled to their own opinion, but I don't understand the adjective "jumbled". There was nothing jumbled about this movie. The ending was very clear to me. I wasn't left thinking, "jee, how shall I interpret that?" If you want to talk about boring, I screened Bourn last week...should have been called "the Boring Identity" compared to Minority Report. I would honestly give this movie four stars of four...it's an interesting story, had sweet CGI, and the acting was under par (remember, under par is better than par). I can't wait to play the video game!!! I want to catch some "pre criminals"~!!! Sooo...again ****/**** SWEET FLICK!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geof Abruzzi
Film Handler
Posts: 14
From: Mesilla, NM, USA
Registered: Jun 2002
|
posted 06-24-2002 10:43 AM
I like the point about the bleaching process making the film look like "film noir" black and white. It also seemed to make a future devoid of color (in many ways, like the other great Dick inspired movie, Blade Runner)[SPOILERS] I'd probably give the film a 3.5 out of 4. Up until he kills Crow, I would have given it closer to a 3.95, but everything after that point was a bit too formulaic. Think about how many movies you have seen where the where the bad guy almost gets away with it, until he makes that slip and mentions a detail that he shouldn't have known. Also think about how many movies have the good guy confront the bad guy by playing video of incriminating evidence at a gathering where everyone can see.
Then there is also the patented Spielberg, "the movie should be over, but I'm going to keep going" ending. Fortunately this time it was only a minute or two long, not 20 like in Shindlers List. Maybe it's hubris to think I have a better way to end the film, but I really think it should have ended with the killing of Crow, and no hint that Crow was a plant, he was the real killer. This would have introduced some very interesting brain wrapping conundrums about the nature of causality, since the event in the future, and knowledge of the event in the future, is what causes the series of events that lead to that future. As it stands now, "the nefarious plot" is what causes everything. None the less, this is one of Spielberg best endeavors in a very long time. Geof
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 06-24-2002 12:52 PM
FYI, here is an American Cinematographer article on the "Soup du Jour" processes, including Technicolor's proprietary ENR process: http://www.theasc.com/magazine/nov98/soupdujour/pg1.htm http://www.cinematographer.com/article/mainv/0,7220,34805,00.html AFAIK, Kodak VISION Premier Color Print Film 2393 was used to make most of the prints, and processed through the Technicolor ENR process to achieve the unique "look" that Spielberg and Kaminski wanted. http://www.cameraguild.com/awards/kaminski.html http://www.theasc.com/magazine/aug98/saving/pg1.htm http://www.theasc.com/magazine/jun98/lumin/pg4.htm http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/story/cinematographers.shtml ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243 e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
John Wilson
Film God
Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 06-25-2002 04:43 AM
This is one FANTASTIC movie. 10 years ago, Harrison Ford would have played Tom Cruise's role. That would have made for one excellent film. SPOILERS! I do feel though, that the last ten minutes caters for Joe Average way too much. Before the rooftop scene, I would have given it 8/10. The ending brought it back to a 7/10. Still, more films like this and we're back in business. Also. read today that this is Tom's 9th successive no. 1 opener. That is one amazing record. He has always been a great actor, but every now and then he shows he is one of the greats. John ------------------ Too much of the rest of the film is given over to a romance between Padme and Anakin in which they're incapable of uttering anything other than the most basic and weary romantic cliches, while regarding each other as if love was something to be endured rather than cherished. There is not a romantic word they exchange that has not long since been reduced to cliche. No, wait: Anakin tells Padme at one point: "I don't like the sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating--not like you. You're soft and smooth." I hadn't heard that before. - Roger Ebert reviewing Episode 2. :)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|