Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: The Safety of All Objects

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Community » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews » The Safety of All Objects

Author

Topic: The Safety of All Objects

Nate Lehrke
Master Film Handler

Posts: 396
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Oct 2002

posted 02-27-2003 01:32 AM

The “Safety of All Objects” is mediocre at best.

Now being that this film was directed by Rose Troche, I expected a gay theme or feministic approach; based on her other two pictures: ‘Go Fish’ & ‘Bedrooms & Hallways’. What I got was a mix of ‘American Beauty’ & ‘The Hours’ (There wasn’t one good male-female relationship throughout the film though)

The feature based on the A.M. Homes book “The Safety of Objects” which has seven short stories which do not relate to each other, except they all share a common setting. The stories are not tied together at the end either. The movie has taken 5 of the shorts and created four families in suburbia. Showing the dysfunctional family from a predominately women’s view.

The movie focuses on 4 days in the lives of a supposed typical suburban family. A mother (Glen Close) and daughter whose relationship was broken after the son/brother injured himself and ended up quadalplegic. The other families include: an angry divorcee whose ex-husband is a stereotypical bad father & a mid-life crisis mother who’s contemplating leaving her husband & a lawyer who hates his life. (One note, all the woman in the stories don’t work whatsoever & have children.)

I felt as if the director was trying to pull off a “Lock, Stock, & Two Smoking Barrels” by having the four seemingly separate stories that would eventually come together in the end. There’s the typical flash back sequence as well as a fantasy sequence & five different voice-over narrations. She has seemingly no character development & I felt no connection to the characters what’s so ever. It seemed like the director wanted to include everything possible in her film that the plot was lost.

There are also many ‘rip off’ scenes (seems to happen more often nowadays) One scene I think they just spliced in about a minute of ‘American Beauty’; Trying to capture the window voyeurism. There is also the “lost character” who is in the film only when convenient but is never seen again (Like in “The Rookie” Where did the infant child go?)

Now, if you take the movie and break it up into 20 minute shorts, it is done well. It’s just the attempt at the emotional connection & tying the stories together that will loose the audience.

All in all. If it’s free…..maybe check it out.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.