Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Gerry

   
Author Topic: Gerry
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-09-2003 09:16 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The plot is thin, the dialogue is insipid, and almost nothing happens. But I loved it, although I can't really explain why.

Go see this now while it is still in theatrical release, as it absolutely demands to be seen on a big screen and will be completely pointless to watch on a TV screen.

A few people will probably understand why I thought that this film was great; most will probably think that I am nuts.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-11-2003 08:55 AM      Profile for Joe Beres   Email Joe Beres   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott, I am on your side here. I showed this film a couple weeks ago, and I loved it. It's very strange film. Sometimes the pacing and plot (or lack there of) remind me of an Abbas Kiarosrami film, but there's the juxtaposition of at least one scene that plays out like an Abbott and Costello routine. The cinematography is quite beautiful, and I really enjoyed the performances of both Matt Damon and Casey Affleck. I think this could prove to be a movie that enfuriates many but really engages a few.

Here's a frustrating/funny anecdote: A few days after we premiered Gerry (a week and a half before it opened here). Gus Van Sant was here for a Dialogue. After the talk was over, someone from the audience raised her hand to "ask a question." Her question basically descibed the end of the film to an audience of whom perhaps 20% (at best) actually saw it. I thought and hoped that the filmmaker would hint at a reprimand for giving away the ending, but instead, he went further to explain what "really" happened in the end of the film and eliminated some of the ambiguity that could be open to interpretation and speculation.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.