Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Seabiscuit

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Community » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews » Seabiscuit

Author

Topic: Seabiscuit

Matthew Sonnenshein
Film Handler

Posts: 11
From: Sparkill, NY, USA
Registered: Jul 2002

posted 07-26-2003 01:19 AM

Loews Cineplex Palisades Center Mall
7:30pm Friday Night show

First let me get out of the way the two things that annoyed me about the presentation of the film. The show began about 10 minutes late. This was for a sold out show so everyone got their early and was ansy for the film to begin. Secondingly the masking for the screen was such that the picture did not fill the exposed screen. I found that pretty distracting. I informed the staff of such but nothing was done about it.

The film itself was nothing special. Some of the performances were very interesting (such as Chris Cooper) but it felt that they strayed away from them. I know it was based on a book about a true story but in general the story curve was exhausting. After, Seabiscuit defeated War Admiral it felt like the end of the movie so having to sit through another 30 minutes was tiring. One should take great pains if when making a movie any longer than 2 hours to adopt the story-telling so that it feels a short as possible. The movie failed in that accord. Some of the shots in the movie were quite eye-pleasing but in general the racing cinematography was ordinary.
I think if the sentimental streak that the movie brandishes is something that has appealled to you in the past you'll like the movie. But otherwise its not worth it.

| IP: Logged

Mitchell Cope
Master Film Handler

Posts: 256
From: Overland Park, KS, United States
Registered: Jun 99

posted 07-26-2003 08:32 AM

This is a very good movie. I think where it fails to become a great movie is that 30 or so years are presented in a series of vignettes that tell the story. Though the acting is great, the actors don't have the dramatic license of time and space for you to feel what their feeling and completely get inside them.

The directing style and art direction made me feel like I was in the thirties. The scenes in Mexico and at the Santa Anita racetrack were as colorful as a postcard from that era.

As opposed to the previous comment, I thought the racing cinematography was extraordinary. The only thing I doubted was how easy it was for jockeys to carry on conversations in mid-race without a lot more hollering.

Didn't see too many teenagers at my show. The old folks turned out for this and boy did they love it. Applause went up when Seabiscuit won that match (spoiler?) and at the film's conclusion.

Wow, they still make movies in Hollywood with a story and no explosions.

| IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 07-28-2003 10:28 PM

This could have been a truly great film. Unfortunately, it didn't quite work out that way. The acting and cinematography are top-notch, but the editing is terribly uneven and occasionally technically wrong (mismatched cuts, etc.). The score is OK, but should have been better (what's that Moby song doing in there, anyhow?). The film is probably worth seeing and should do fairly well, but it's annoying to think about how great this film could have been with only a few relatively minor changes.

It's not that I didn't enjoy the film. I just felt like it was a terrible waste of an opportunity to make something memorable.

| IP: Logged

Jonathan Ralston
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 07-29-2003 01:45 AM

I enjoyed the film, but really was expecting more. I understand that they didn't want to make a three hour film, but the quick jumping around in the beginning was a little annoying. not to mention the old people smell in the crowded theater

| IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 08-01-2003 09:26 AM

I pretty much agree with every thing stated above. I did find this one enjoyable to watch. I give it *** out of four stars

| IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 08-03-2003 05:38 PM

Regal Cinema World 8, Eugene, House #6, SR-D, 12:00 8/3/2003. Attendance about 50. Pretty good technically except not loud enough for my taste and the surrounds didn't seem to be working at all. There were a few randomly-scattered scratches.

I enjoyed it. Falls short of "great" but it's very good. I guess you could say it has a lot of heart. [thumbsup]

| IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 08-27-2003 10:44 PM

I felt as if this was the feel-good movie of the summer. I really enjoyed the acting, the story, and the beautiful cinematography. As for the sound mix, we ran it at our reference level and the trailers were ridiculousy loud. However, the film overall is rather quiet, dialouge especially. I saw it in DTS in a house that is usually perfect so I know it isn't the auditorium, just the mix I think David.

AJG

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.