|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Radio
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 10-17-2003 04:31 AM
This year has brought us some very good memorable films such as Pirates of the Caribbean, Finding Nemo, Open Range and Holes.
This year has also brought us other memorable films in a more evil and horrifying sense, such as From Justin to Kelly, The Hulk, Spy Kids 3D, Gigli, etc...because they were soooooooooooo bad. I know the competition for the throne is really tough this year, but Radio may very well make my #1 spot as worst movie of 2003.
Radio tells the story of a retarded man, a football coach and a newbie director trying to win an Academy Award and to move people. Well, there was movement alright, but I don't think people's bowels was the kind these boys were trying to achieve.
There is one good performance in this film and that is Ed Harris, but it is by no means anything special. (Ed Harris always does a good job, but he has done better.) Cuba Gooding Jr. does a decent job at playing a retarded man, but really these guys aren't the problem here. The problem is the story, the screenplay and the director. This movie soooooooooo wants to be Hoosiers or Rudy, but it flat out fails over and over in every scene. Dialogue is corny and although the filmmakers are trying as hard as they can to shove pity for this fellow down the audience's throat, it just doesn't work. The question "how many more reels are left?" is the nagging issue throughout the film.
A friend of mine has a theory that the public doesn't want to see good movies, but will come out in droves to see pure crap. Well, if his theory holds up, this movie will do incredible business.
"We're not teaching Radio. He has been teaching us." Could we possibly cheeze the cliches up any more???
Avoid this piece of crap. It's been done many times before, and ALL of them were better. Instead, stay home and rent Rudy or Hoosiers and see a REAL movie. If you've already seen those movies too many times before, repeatedly smashing your head into a brick wall is almost certainly a better way to kill two hours of your life.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 10-23-2003 10:48 PM
Damn Brad...
Phil, you're, quite simply, an ass kisser.... You're harsh. I thought this was, indeed, one of the better movies of the year. Then again, T.L. Hannah HS is a few hours away from me in upstate SC and the truth behind the film is what draws me in. Ed Harris was great, as he normally is, and Cuba Gooding Jr. was awesome as well, as he normally is.
This film had heart. It stirred emotions. It had a message. I found it to be much better than most of the I've endured this year (and years past).
And the scene where he scribbles his name... The REAL Radio does the same.... he still is unable to write yut everyone knows him..
He gladly points out that he has a business card... shows you his name..a smiles the whole time..
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack Ondracek
Film God
Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 10-24-2003 10:40 PM
What's sad is that you naysayers are so oversaturated with this business, you can't possibly offer an opinion that compares favorably with reality. Professional critics are probably the only group that's worse. The average audience doesn't see nearly as much of this stuff as we do.
Yah... the film is full of formula. It also reminded me of Hoosiers, but not until I left the auditorium and thought about it for a while. The ending bit... I assume that's the real "Radio", is a classic rip-off of "A League Of Their Own", where they trot out some surviving members of the All American Girls Professional Baseball League.
It really is OK to go into a film knowing that you aren't going to be wowed by overdone CGI pizazz, or even a story that's so original and complex it would impress a critic from PBS. And who cares if the audience falls for a bit of "light entertainment"? Our jobs will all end soon if the baseline for decent theatrical entertainment is an original story and CGI that hasn't been used before.
Oh... I liked it. I wouldn't buy a ticket twice, but I didn't walk away feeling like I'd totally wasted my time, either.
(edit)... [ 10-25-2003, 12:17 PM: Message edited by: Jack Ondracek ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|