Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Scooby Doo 2

   
Author Topic: Scooby Doo 2
Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 03-25-2004 02:10 AM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
[bs] [bs] [bs] [bs] [puke]

Emoticons speak so loudly.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-25-2004 02:53 AM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I found it to be alright...take it for what it is. Which isn't much.

I was more interested in the Vancouver locations in the film.

There's a nice shot of the Waterfront for the opening shot, then it goes through all the buildings ( which is CG I'm guessing, the road ways are different ). The Vancouver Art Gallery was the building where *spoilers* the items were stolen.

There was a funny location switch were the van is driving down what looks to be Robson street and all of a sudden ends up at the Brittania Mines which is about a 45 minute drive from there.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-25-2004 11:32 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aaron spoke it best.

Unless you're a total glutton for punishment, AVOID THIS FILM.

This one surpassed the first one with regard to it's "suckiness" to coin a phrase from Joe.

0/5

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 03-26-2004 08:38 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe I'll be the only one here who actually enjoyed this movie, but that's ok.

I found it to be a lot more fun than the first one. Like Ron said, take it for what it is, and don't expect too much. Of course the dialog is bad. The special effects are sorta hit and miss. The acting is not great, but ok for the most part. But it's based on a cartoon, so what do you expect?

Still, I had fun watching this movie. And isn't that what it's all about? 3 / 5

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.