my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Collateral (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Collateral Nate Lehrke Master Film Handler Posts: 396 From: Denver, CO Registered: Oct 2002 posted 07-22-2004 05:08 AM                     I liked it. I enjoyed both Tom Cruise and Jamie Foxx as the leads. I had no problem with Tom Cruise looking like an older man. The hand to hand fight scenes were cool and the action had a good pace. It had a predictable plot but was still entertaining. The critics that are saying that this is just like Phonebooth, but in a taxi. I would argue that this actually had some plot and character development. If you like action/adventure, you'll enjoy it.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 08-05-2004 03:35 PM                     I agree, a pretty entertaining film. While it has it's share of flaws (the whole suspension of disbelief thing only works so much), this is the best action/suspense movie of the year so far. Definitely worth a trip out to see. Great sound mix and sharp picture too.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 08-05-2004 06:46 PM                     Sharp picture? Even with much of the movie shot on videotape?  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 08-05-2004 07:31 PM                     The video originated footage is fairly obvious, but yes sharp throughout. Note I didn't say "ultra high resolution" or anything, just sharp. Maybe I'm just getting spoiled these last couple of months because I have been screening most of my films on Christies (1998-2002) then more recently screening on Simplexes (2002-2004) and I am currently screening on Kinotons which blow everything I've ever ran out of the water. All the old timers will "bah" at my comments babbling about how perfect their machines are, but the Kinoton heads produce a truly phenomenal difference that you must see to really believe, similar to how people think their presentations are wonderful until they see a presentation with FilmGuard. Then suddenly they realize their presentations weren't so great before. (Someone's going to come on here and want to challenge that again, so take it to the FHF if you want to argue the facts.)  |  IP: Logged Jason Black Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1723 From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 08-05-2004 11:51 PM                        Y-A-W-N... I found no real redeeming qualities in this film. The rhetorical conversations held in the taxi were less than entertaining and quite boorish, IMO. I was thankful to see the pace pick up at the end but it was somewhat painful getting there. 2/5  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 08-07-2004 11:46 PM                        Today, Regal Cinema World 8 in Eugene. Excellent presentation, no complaints. For being shot on video, this looked pretty damn good (puts the live-action parts of, oh, say, SW Ep 2 to shame for sharpness and detail). I really liked this - best film I've seen this summer, or at least since the last time I said that. Looking forward to seeing Jamie Fox in "Ray". They captured the "look" of LA perfectly. 4 out of 5 stars from me, well worth seeing in a good theater.  |  IP: Logged Pravin Ratnam Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 844 From: Atlanta, GA,USA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 08-08-2004 02:07 AM                     Saw it at Regal Perimeter Pointe in Atlanta. THe dumb morons at this theater made one of their many allocation blunders. Same theater which put T3 in a small house opening day, and the KB2 in a medium house opening day, outdid themselves today. They actually showed Big Black Book in their big hall, and put Collateral in their next biggest one with a big dropoff in seat numbers. And they had the fast dropping VIllage in two medium screens. Collateral was crowded by the time the Regal 20 hit while Big Black Book didnt have much of a crowd. Their stupidity is amazing. At least, they got their presentation better this time. No picture was offframe. Sound was good. Movie itself: Wow, I have always been a big supporter of Jamie Foxx's talent and I am glad it took a Tom Cruise movie(so it gets good marketing) to showcase Foxx because the guy has a wide range. He can do comedy, drama, and action. He showed his potential in Any Given Sunday and he gets his showcase with collateral. Tom Cruise was good in his role. Doesn't overdo the big smile. Jada Pinkett is the rare warm female character to grace a Mann movie. I am glad he didn't use one of those Diane Verona cold bitch types. While some may feel the pace is slow, I enjoyed it because the actors do such a good job at making you not wanting the pace to quicken up. The only times I felt distracted by the video feel was when they show the back of the taxi in some shots. Otherwise good camerawork. Best movie of the summer for me so far. It was not an instant classic, but it delivers on what it sets out to do.  |  IP: Logged Ron Lacheur Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 650 From: British Columbia, Canada Registered: Feb 2002 posted 08-08-2004 02:41 AM                     Being a huge Michael Mann fan, I was really looking forward to this and it didn't let me down. I thought alot of the scenes were very similar to Mann's other movies *possible Spoiler alert* The ending was very similar to Heat. As for the digitally shot footage, it's pretty obvious which is film and what's digital, especially when the camera does a quick movement such as when the corpse falls on the cab and Jamie Foxx comes flying out of it. Highly Recommended.  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Fuentes Mmmm, Dr. Pepper! Posts: 1168 From: Corpus Christi, TX United States Registered: Jan 2004 posted 08-09-2004 06:28 AM                     Awesome movie! One of the best of the summer, go see it today or else I'll smash your face in!!  |  IP: Logged Chris Hipp Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1462 From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas) Registered: Jul 2003 posted 08-09-2004 04:18 PM                     This movie was good but it could have been better ****SPOILER**** maybe I think the ending should have been different. Vincent should have faked dying on the bus and got up and shot the cab driver and my ex girlfriend Jada pinkett in the back of the head and then ended with a close up/fade out on his face. That would have been better.  |  IP: Logged Pravin Ratnam Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 844 From: Atlanta, GA,USA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 08-09-2004 06:54 PM                     Chris, that would have been too predictable. And it wouldn't tie in with the earlier story he tells Jamie. Also I thought you didn't do the mixed race thing despite no aesthetic problems with the other race? Is that your way of wish fulfillment so you don't have to take her home?  |  IP: Logged Chris Hipp Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1462 From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas) Registered: Jul 2003 posted 08-09-2004 08:32 PM                     notice how I say Ex. Sorry but I cant mess around with Will smith's wife. He is a little bigger than I am. ***SPOILERS*** I think that ending would tie in with the whole "I'm vincent and im invincible" theme though. I felt that him dying on the subway was too predictable, as soon as you heard the story in the beginning you knew it would end that way. The only thing that was not predictable was Mark Ruffalo's character getting shot.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 08-10-2004 12:59 AM                     I finally got a chance to watch "Collateral" this evening (at the Carmike 8 of course, the only acceptable theater in my town). Aside from some of the arguably predictable plot developments, as well as some other police procedural gaping holes in the story, this was a really entertaining movie. Tom Cruise did a good job playing a driven yet despicable villian. He didn't quite score the kind of "I can't believe he's doing this shit" oomph Denzel Washington hit with "Training Day" but it was very good nonetheless. The action sequence in the night club near the film's end had Cruise's "Vincent" hit-man character resembling the unstoppable nature of the T-1000 in "Terminator 2." Pretty good sound mix on this one. I can tell Michael Mann loves jet airliner plane-by effects in the surrounds. These are not quite as good as the bass-whalloping ones in "Heat." A little more subtle this time. Oh, the video. I agree the videography on this one was pretty sharp. They obviously used some good high definition video cameras. Still, you could tell the difference between the film-originated parts versus the video stuff. Two main artifacts give it away. The video sourced content, although sharp, suffers from a flattened color quality -probably the price of going from an RGB-based medium over to film's CMY substractive side. And there was this wierd kind of image drag/smear thing happening all the time. Did they shoot this stuff 24p? The image smear thing makes me wonder. At any rate, the video to film footage in "Collateral" looks a damned sight better than the vast majority of all other DV-to-film stuff I've seen up to this point. Honestly, and I'm not sure if they would do this, I would offer this suggestion when this show gets ported to DVD. Leave the video footage looking like video. Take out that photo-chemical step. The color quality will be much much much better. If any Hollywood filmmaker wants to extoll the virtues of shooting on digital videotape, then he should have the guts to allow the footage to look like video rather than something it is not (film). In going through the pretentious step of trying to make video look like film, the image quality suffers a massive generational drop in quality. The best looking HD video footage I have seen has been footage that was left entirely in the video realm.  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 08-10-2004 01:34 AM                        quote: Chris Hipp and my ex girlfriend Jada That's more a technical question: is an ex-girlfriend automatically also an es-girlfriend?  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 08-10-2004 05:24 PM                     Where does that leave the other chicks Ultra, Pana, and Smart D Long rotten week but Hell I am alive The movie is a typical late summer show...O.K. screen filler. The HD was good but the "smear" on action was more distracting than from a rotating shutter in a film camera.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.