|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
|
Robert L. Fischer
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 145
From: Montreal, Quebec
Registered: May 2004
|
posted 09-16-2004 11:44 AM
I struggle to find a real point to this movie, other than being an homage to classic film noir. It does share a similar thematic realm with this year's I, Robot, but the feel of the movie is less serous and more campy. The bluescreen technique is noticable, but the visuals are still stunning, and the dark, yellow-washed cinematography gives the movie the atmosphere it needs. There are a few funny one-liners, and the special effects are entertaining, but I was hoping for something more intellectually engaging -- perhaps in the vain of Gattaca, also co-starring Jude Law. All in all, it's not a bad movie for a little entertainment, but I would've loved to see the same cast and cinematography matched to a more challenging script.
6/10
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don Anderson
Master Film Handler
Posts: 312
From: West Bend, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 09-17-2004 02:51 AM
Brad, I take it that you didn't take your meds today???? I thought that the film was a visual masterpiece. Screw the comparison to I ROBOT. More like the old Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers serials. Sure, there were some corny one liners, but all and all it was action packed and entertaining. I got a kick out of the Wizard of Oz playing on the screen in the theatre. I liked the film, the rest of my staff enjoyed it too. So, it entertained a graphics,photography,film history,mechanical engineer, and art students/and or grads.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-17-2004 09:00 PM
Loved it. The story isn't especially original (lots of references to Oz, Metropolis, Star Wars, Raiders, and tons of other films), but the visuals really make this film. I never thought I'd say this, but the HD cinematography actually "works" for this show by giving a slightly soft edge to the image, which is appropriate for the subject matter and setting. This is one of the most creative and original films that I have seen in a long time. Hopefully it will do well at the boxoffice.
Edit (err...addendum): Saw it again tonight and it holds up well to a second viewing. Those in the Boston area might want to know that cinema #2 at the Loews Boston Common theatre has what appears to be an EK print (or whatever the equivalent is for a non-film-originated movie; it has handmade cues and looks marginally better than the print playing in cinema #13 at the AMC Fenway theatre). Of course, Loews also had the Idiot Cell Phone Lady who decided to sit next to me and actually answered her ringing phone in the middle of the feature. I almost killed her. [ 09-18-2004, 09:39 PM: Message edited by: Scott Norwood ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Ron Yost
Master Film Handler
Posts: 344
From: Paso Robles, CA
Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 09-17-2004 11:22 PM
I absolutely agree with Scott! This film is magnificent! Simply wonderful!! The gorgeous art-deco 'moderne' design is just stunning. I'm not exagerating. It's a living comic book, as I've read in one review. There has been nothing like this before.
It took me a few scenes to 'get into' the whole approach the film was going to take, as it's so different from anything I've seen before. Once one gets 'adjusted' to it, tho, it moves right along at a nice pace, tho it's not an 'all action, all the time' film at all.
The script is just perfect, too. I didn't find it 'cutesy' , it's appropriately emotional when it needs to be and there are a some great comic rejoinders between the two leads. Marvelous!! The script is good right down to the last words .. which are really good and close-off the experience perfectly, but I won't spoil anyone's fun.
All the actors did a very nice job, too .. and Jude Law is really good. Never going 'over the top', as would have been easy to do with this material. Gwenyth Paltrow isn't one of my fave actors, but she did a good job .. tho her thin whining voice got on my nerves a few times. Angelina Jolie is perfect! Tho she doesn't appear as often as I would have liked. All the other actors are fine, also.
Here's a bit of a review of this film I found online .. kinda' sums up my feelings, though it's far better written than I'm capable of:
"George Lucas talks of creating whole movies with computer images, while turning out emotionless and mechanical films. Conran has actually done what Lucas aspires to, and what he's created is a living, breathing work of art."
I'm going to see it again tomorrow. Hopefully with a larger audience .. there were only 5 other people in the auditorium today at the first matinee.
Ron Yost [ 09-18-2004, 12:50 AM: Message edited by: Ron Yost ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|