Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Kinsey

   
Author Topic: Kinsey
Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 11-23-2004 04:58 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pretty good but a little slow towards the end.

 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-23-2004 06:34 PM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The trailer looks good, looking forward to it.

JJ

 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 12-25-2004 07:00 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was afraid this film might be of historical or nostalgic interest only, but found its treatment very timely.

Liam Neeson ["Schindler's List"] portrays the entomologist and teacher Dr. Alfred Kinsey whose 20 year zoological study of the gall fly's variation of species caused him to apply scientific methods to the study of human sexuality after becoming aware of the enormous ignorance of sex among his students and the great marital unhappiness resulting from it.

Since Kinsey's inductive methods relied heavily on surveys and interviews, the film's narrative method utilizes Kinsey's training one of his staff interviewers, interviewing him about his personal sexual history. These b/w questions are intercut with dramatized answers in color.

Bill Condon's direction presents the researcher as a man driven by altruism and scientific search for truth, beset by hypocrisy and bigotry. The film's release is timely because even today scientific research is under attack by religious and political groups, as witnessed by the petition of the 48 Nobel Scientists, the restrictions on sex education ("abstinence only"), family planning funding and stem-cell research, and the required teaching of "creationism" in Nebraska.

I wondered whether some of the story complications involving the sexual affairs of staff members were script insertions merely to heighten drama. And I could have done without the grainy b/w zoo shots of copulating animals gratuitously thrown into the final credits.

But the story held my interest, and gave me better perspective on the books published during my years, and the changes in American attitudes and legislation they effected.

Kew Gardens Cinema, 12/25/04, 118". Audience: 36 Seniors,
2 M.A., and 3 Y.A.

 |  IP: Logged

Jennifer Pan
THE JEN!

Posts: 1219
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 03-24-2005 07:46 PM      Profile for Jennifer Pan   Author's Homepage   Email Jennifer Pan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I enjoyed it and there were parts that were humorous that I didn't expect. I thought it was going to be completely serious and that I would probably be falling asleep. But I didn't so that's a good sign.

Ah, yes my hot rating...
Chris O'Donnell... hot as always.

 |  IP: Logged

Erica Peterson
Film Handler

Posts: 26
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 03-26-2005 08:22 PM      Profile for Erica Peterson   Author's Homepage   Email Erica Peterson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought the animal stuff at the end was pretty funny...especially the two porcupines very cautiously circling each other. That's got to be difficult to get right [Big Grin]

And Peter Sarsgaard sets off my hottie meter...

 |  IP: Logged

Christian Appelt
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 505
From: Frankfurt, Germany
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 03-27-2005 04:29 PM      Profile for Christian Appelt   Email Christian Appelt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it's a good story told straight, the only thing I disliked was the shallow depth of field. Lots of unnecessary focus pulling in dialogue scenes, some shots that should have been retaken (technically), like the close ups and medium shots of Kinsey proposing to his wife which are totally out of focus.

Very sad that editors and/or directors do not trust great images. The film has some fantastic shots like Kinsey collapsing in the "arena" of the Rockefeller Foundation, but it seems that cutters are paid by the number of cuts they make. [Roll Eyes]

If you have such fine actors and a good story, don't jump around too much in unnecessary cutting.

Great acting and very impressive set design and lighting. I'll definitely see it again (I caught only the dubbed version yesterday... [thumbsdown] )

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.