Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Son Of The Mask (2005)

   
Author Topic: Son Of The Mask (2005)
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 02-26-2005 12:21 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
HOLY CRAP! What an unbelieveable waste of time. From the time that I saw the first trailer for this, I knew it would be bad. But here's the thing... usually when I think something is bad, someone else ...SOMEWHERE thinks that it's good, and I understand that.

I have not taken the time to sit through this movie from start to finish, because I knew that not only would I not be entertained, but I also knew that watching this movie would make me kill myself, and I'm not ready to die yet.

However, I've seen enough of it from doing theater checks to see that just about NO ONE likes this movie. I've stood in the back and watched scenes that are trying to be funny... trying REALLY HARD to be funny, with joke after joke after joke, and NO ONE in the theater is laughing. Not even the kids.

Now maybe our customers are a bunch of sour pusses, but I don't think so. When I get over to Hitch, generally everyone in the auditorium is laughing their ass off. But with this movie... no reaction at all.

I'll give this movie -3 stars (yes, that's negative three) out of 5. Now, please excuse me while I go wash my eyes out with chlorine.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-26-2005 01:47 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have not seen this movie, but only wanted to comment that Rotten Tomatoes website had the Tomato Meter on this one at a jaw droppingly low 04%. That's pretty damned bad. I'm not sure if there's anything in their database any lower than that.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-26-2005 04:06 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some movies you just know are going to suck when you first read the title in the upcoming-releases lists. This is one of those movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Don Cross
Film Handler

Posts: 97
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 02-26-2005 04:51 PM      Profile for Don Cross   Email Don Cross   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Most of the aspects which make up this "movie" give it a rating of 3 out of 10. Luckily I didn't have to pay money for this one.

-And "they" can't figure out why the actor prom the previous version most likely turned it down??

[sleep]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.