|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Batman Begins
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester
Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004
|
posted 06-14-2005 07:46 AM
I agree ... it's a great DMR transfer. This one looked a little crisper without the "sharpening filter" artifacts that I noticed a lot in Spiderman 2.
As for the movie itself, it was, as everyone who's seen it seems to think, really good!
The first act was a great psychological drama, and quickly paced. It shaped the Wayne character and gave some strong insight into the Batman origins. I think this will be compared a lot to Anakin's transformation to Vader. Or more accurately, you just may hear people saying "Now THIS is the way to tell the story of a character's early struggles in a prequel designed to fill in back story to a familiar franchise!" It was continuously interesting, and deftly brought in the various aspects of Batman ... taming fears, dealing with justice and revenge, anger, growth, lots of stuff. This movie "showed" me what was making Bruce Wayne tick, rather than what the Star Wars script did by only "telling" me about the seduction to the Dark Side. Effective use of flashbacks, and straightforward approach in the directing.
The movie then smoothly leaps into good Batman action. Chases and whatnot. Good villain setup. Great characters all around. The ultimate "evil villain plan to destroy the world"-type aspect of the plot didn't come off as cheesy as it would have if someone told me about it. In another movie, it wouldn't have been as convincing, I think.
Seeing just screenshots, I thought Katie Holmes looked too much like an airhead. However, it's a pretty strong character. I'm still not sure she completely pulled it off, but she did a better job than I was expecting. And not just at refraining from wearing bras ... something she's apparently good at.
I liked Morgan Freeman's character, and Gary Oldman was good too. Yeah, I think this was a strong cast. Michael Caine was perfect.
As a whole, this is a good story, and well told; regardless of being just another in a long series of superhero adaptations. That aside, it still stands on its own. It didn't have a comic book feel. It was just the story of a man, his fears, his city, and Katie Holmes in some cold air.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004
|
posted 06-14-2005 10:38 AM
I've been waiting for this movie for over a year...and needless to say when I found out that it would be arriving on Monday, the weekend became that much longer! The film arrived right on time monday morning. I left a note saying call me when it comes in, I want to build it.(To make sure it was perfect ) After building it, was a long drawn out day of nothing leading up to the screening.
Like I said, I've been waiting for this film for over a year. I'm a Christian Bale fan, I think hes a solid actor who approach's every role with all his heart. I mean just look at the Machinist. He embodies his roles, and becomes the part. And thats exactly what he did with Bruce Wayne. He wasn't too over the top when being the play-boy Bruce Wayne. You can even see that when hes talking with Rachel he wants to tell her then, that its just a cover up. Just like later on at the party, he doesn't care what people think of him.
I was very skeptical about using Ra's as the main villain, but they made him work. The story arc for the character was very well done. And for anyone who didn't read the spoilers, I think will be surprised to see the outcome. My only complaint is that the Scarecrow, albeit a minor villain in the film. Was really really under used. When the gas was in effect he was very cool, and Creepy.
Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman, and Micheal Cain were all fantastic in there respective roles. I'm so glad there going to be keeping Freeman around for another film. His character was great. Gary Oldman owned Gordon, he was perfect. As well as Micheal Cain, he was fantastic as Alfred.
I've been defending the Tumbler sense they first released it, I think its perfect for the film. This film is based in reality, Tim Burtons Batmobile would not work in this film. Batman needed something tough, dark, and scary. This is far more scary then a long shoe. This Batmobile had a purpose, Burtons had no purpose but to look "cool". The chase was awsome, do you think that Burton's Batmobile could do what the Tumbler did in that chase? I don't think so.
I give this film a GIANT 10 out of 10
I will be seeing Batman Begins tonight at the 12:01 showing...then I will be traveling down to Grand Rapids on Wednesday to see it on the big ol' IMAX !
Oh by the way I just wanted to do a shamless plug right here, today (June 14th) is my 22nd birthday. I didn't want to make a post just about that. I hope you all enjoy this great film!
"I swear to GOD!"
"SWEAR TO ME!!!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.
Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004
|
posted 06-15-2005 03:50 PM
CINEMA: Century 20 Jordan Creek, West Des Moines, IA AUDITORIUM: 11 PRESENTATION: Dolby Digital/THX PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: Uh...nothing out of the ordinary. RATING: Two stars (out of four)
WARNING: Spoilers are an excellent substitute for butter
This movie pissed me off.
First off, it takes about an hour to get moving. Second, the dialouge. I spent a good portion of the movie refraining from shouting "SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUT THE HELL UP!" at the screen. Then when the action gets going, much if it is presented in "Michael Bay horror flick trailer teaser" fashion. Thirdly, and most importanly, HOW much does Ducard have to do for Bruce to realize that he IS Bruce's father?!? He didn't die...He went off into the wild to forge a gang of ninja thugs to take back Gotham, and madness ensued. All that crap about how the whole thing was his father's fault? I was a breath short of screaming "HE IS YOUR FATHER, YOU IDIOT!" about a half dozen times through the movie. This would have been SO much better if they'd taken the script in that direction. Then Rachel at the end...Oooh...I would have killed her right there.
The two stars are basically for the production. The soundtrack even managed to push the limits of the sound system here. There's a couple of explosions where it must distort to hell in the cheap builds.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|