my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Rent

Author Topic: Rent Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 11-24-2005 04:15 PM                     A qualified recommendation. While I liked the original stage production immensely, and have played the original cast CD numerous times, the movie was a bit of a letdown. However, I did enjoy seeing faces to the (mostly) original cast that I have heard. It might be it’s just impossible to capture the same freshness of a live cast on a fairly neutral stage design than seeing the theatrical songs in a real setting. One problem is the decision to drop the sing-songy bridges between numbers for dialogue. While this was initially a good idea in my opinion, it doesn’t work because they didn’t change the words, they’re just spoken without music, rhymed lines and all. Having said that, there is much to admire. Production values are strong, and some of the songs resonate with power and emotion. While the plight of most of these people are of their own doing, they are still human beings, flaws and all. Theatre: Edwards (Regal) Bakersfield 14. Print quality was excellent. No noticeable grain and rich solid color and blacks. Changeover cues were yellow and sometimes looked etched in. Presentation was just about perfect. Framing was centered, focus was the sharpest I’ve seen in a long time, even brightness throughout. The sound (SRD) was also properly calibrated with no distortion.  |  IP: Logged Dan Lyons Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 698 From: Seal Beach, CA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 11-25-2005 03:29 AM                     Have to disagree here about a few things. Overall, it was an entertaining film with some good music. It also had some really bad music; dialog set to music. The age of the actors didn't fit with the roles; they were at least 10 years too old for their parts. Technically, it was just average. I didn't notice anything special as far as color, though it did have great steadiness. Grain was very visible from the back of the theatre; damn super 35!! I'll give it 3 out of 5 stars.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-25-2005 09:20 PM                     quote: Dan Lyons Overall, it was an entertaining film with some good music. It also had some really bad music; dialog set to music. Well said. I saw this live in Chicago before I moved out to Utah... it almost put me to sleep except that the moving lights were quite entertaining. Personally this thing sucks big time... I have not been back to a live show since. Mark  |  IP: Logged Frank Dubrois Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 896 From: Cleveland, OH Registered: Mar 2005 posted 11-25-2005 10:41 PM                    I haven't seen it, but from what I heard, its a musical about AIDS and eviction?? If so, who the hell wants to go to a "feel good movie" like that?  |  IP: Logged Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 11-27-2005 07:56 PM                     RENT - 2nd viewing Well, this time I went to see it at a different theatre in Bakersfield. The projection of this theatre (Regal's UA East Hills Mall, major upgrades since the take-over)) is just as good as what I saw at the Edwards. It was as bright, evenly lit and focused. It was the print that was inferior. It was grainy, fuzzy in places, and color was weaker. There was one reel that seemed to be filled with what I can only guess was negative dirt from the printing stage (lots of tiny white specks). There were also 5 lab splices (2 in one reel). Changeover cues looked normal in this print, black ovals with yellow outlines (all but the first reel's cues were yellow without the black fill, and definitely looked scratched in (weren't as steady as normal, not solidly yellow, either).  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 11-27-2005 08:49 PM                     LOL, kinda sucks when we booth personnel really can't sit down and just simply enjoy a movie without "ripping" the movie and the auditorium apart left and right..especially when we are watching someone elses presentations. We're kinda doomed in that area... Only time when we can really enjoy a movie is the one we are running and/or have put together ourselves and watching it for the first time... -Monte  |  IP: Logged Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 11-27-2005 08:52 PM                     To clarify, both presentations I saw were excellent as far as projection quality was concerned. It was the quality difference of the two prints that surprised me.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 11-27-2005 11:02 PM                     Paul, the projection equipment plays a crucial role in how the final image on screen looks. For example, Schneider lenses have better color saturation and better contrast (particularly over the washed out looking ISCO "red" line). Significantly better colors can be had from one lamphouse to another (for example a Christie lamphouse will be much more colorful than a CFS). Likewise, better contrast and colors are generally found from Harkness screens. Also some projectors are simply capable of projecting a higher resolution image than others (Kinoton shines in this department). Heck, even the color and placement of auditorium wall treatment affects the image! It is for this reason that the first dozen feet (or more) of an auditorium should be nothing but pure black. As such, it isn't fair to say that one print was inferior to another unless you screened both prints on the same equipment.  |  IP: Logged Richard Greco Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1180 From: Plant City, FL Registered: Nov 2003 posted 12-13-2005 12:10 AM                     Well, I finally got time to see this one... Having never seen or heard the Broadway production, I wanted to see this for what it was. I really liked the music, Upon first listen, I thought it was great. While not the best movie of the year, I really enjoyed it and the musical numbers. There is a Greco factor here.....(no not with "Angel" you sick freaks ) I must say I was very entertained during "Mimi's" "Out Tonight" number....Definately 8/10 for that. On the movie, however. I'd give it also an 8/10 having no prior exposure to the play. Very Enjoyable.  |  IP: Logged William Hooper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1879 From: Mobile, AL USA Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-13-2005 01:42 AM                        quote: Frank Dubrois I haven't seen it, but from what I heard, its a musical about AIDS and eviction?? If so, who the hell wants to go to a "feel good movie" like that? It's based on "La Boheme", a feel-good singalong Puccini opera about tuberculosis & poverty.  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 12-13-2005 11:46 PM                  Interesting parallel William... never thought about it until you mention it but I totally agree. I have mixed feelings about it... I though it was good, but I'm soooooooooo sick of negative gay and AIDS films that I could barf. 2 stars for the above reasons.  |  IP: Logged Carl Martin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1424 From: Oakland, CA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 12-14-2005 02:46 AM                        i didn't perceive the movie as being negative towards gays, unless you count the dorky guy being gently razzed about losing his girlfriend to another girl. you're right about it being negative towards aids, though. if i were aids i'd be totally offended.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.