|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Ratatouille (2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 06-30-2007 08:55 PM
I agree. While the story did get a little long before the third act, the awesome animation and attention to detail made up for it. Probably a bit "talky" for the little kiddies, but that's OK, this isn't a film for little kiddies. Pixar hits another one out of the park.
The big chase scene/rainstorm near the beginning is my favorite part so far (especially when the "colony" is revealed), but the segment where Remy is trying to stay out of sight in the restaurant kitchen for the first time is close behind. Just awesome.
I also really enjoyed the sound mix. Good use of surrounds, nice low end.
4.75 out of 5 from me.
A quarter of a star added for not putting any "extras" at the very end. I hate it when people ask me if there are extras, and I say yes, so they wait through 10 minutes of credits, then they watch the extra and come out saying, "Well THAT wasn't so great."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Marshall
Film God
Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 07-03-2007 08:58 AM
Excellent movie, yet again, Pixar. Job well done.
The animation that Pixar puts out is nothing short of breathtaking anymore. The sets that they create, the shots of all of the rats running in and out of a room, the scene where the rat is drifting down the sewer, and water drips on his head... wow. Take that, Dreamworks & Sony Animation. The sound mixes on Pixars movies are also always top notch, not to mention they spend the extra $$$ on the higher contrast stock. It's nice to see a company take real pride in their work.
4.75 out of 5. A great movie, and I'm looking forward to Wall-e.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-03-2007 02:01 PM
Location: Carmike 8 Auditorium: #3, 10:00pm show Format: Christie DLP/Doremi Server, 2048 X 852 pixels Rating: 3.5 stars out of 4
Ratatouille is yet another very entertaining Pixar movie, and another I'll definitely add to my DVD collection (and buy again whenever I move up to the HD thing).
Lots of good comedic moments. Lightning. Old lady with shotgun. Stampeding rats. Food!
I thought Patton Oswalt sounded a little like Richard Dreyfuss.
Peter O'Toole did an excellent job voicing food critic Anton Ego (and Pixar did a great job animating the toothy, brooding character).
The only area where I thought the movie stumbled a little was late in the 2nd act where the storyline ventured into the predictable and obligatory area where characters have to get at odds with each other and risk everything going to hell. You can see that sort of thing coming from a mile away with most movies. Although the movie qualifies as G-rated fare, a good deal of the material may still be over the heads of elementary school age children.
Even though some parts of the movie were predictable, I loved how it finished.
During the end titles (which were also well done by the way) a piece of retro art featured the slogan "100% Real Animation. No Motion Capture." This brings up one of the major differences that separates a Pixar feature from other movies with CGI.
The CGI effects in most live action movies are churned out in a few months. Even some fully animated movies are manufactured this quickly. Get the movie from "green light" to DVD as fast as possible to maximize profit and minimize interest payments on all that borrowed money. It takes an average of 3 years for a Pixar movie to go through actual production -and that's not counting all the story development time. The difference really shows.
Each Pixar movie release has pushed the boundaries of what was possible in computer animation and defined new standards of excellence. Ratatouille is no exception.
Pixar has been able to animate hair and fur very well for its past few features. This time each strand or whisker had many layers of subtle appearance from levels of shine and transparency to dry, damp, soaked and even scorched textures. I really liked the varying depth of field camera lens treatments used to soften certain edges and throw in blur where desired. More than enough was done for many scenes to achieve a photo-realistic feel while also maintaining the look of an animated movie.
To be fair, other studios like Sony Pictures Animation and PDI/Dreamworks are making big strides. However, Pixar is simply on another level. It's obvious those guys really love their work. They put in a lot of extra effort to add many layers of subtle refinement and personality to each scene. Some of that they strive to do requires some serious, innovative software engineering.
The short feature, Lifted, was the funniest Pixar short since For The Birds. It's a good homage to Close Encounters and had a little of the Monsters Inc. feel to it too. The "Wilhelm" scream was a good cherry on top.
Presentation Quality
Image quality: Very good. The feature looked great, just as I expected.
Audio quality: Pretty good. Decent surround use. Music score had a lot of subtle detail to it. The LPCM 5.1 works well to convey that.
Audience quality: Most of the audience was well behaved. However, it only takes a few selfish idiots to cause serious distractions and disruptions in a theater. Several teenage boys sat in the third row of the theater compulsively texting on their mobile phones. Of course, everyone else in the theater could see those bright, distracting displays.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|