my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Untraceable (2008)

Author Topic: Untraceable (2008) David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-26-2008 10:23 PM                        Today 5:05PM, Regal 15 in Eugene, #5, 35mm. Print was scratched from beginning to end (horizontal scratches down the center of the image). The digital sound dropped out at the start of reel 4 and there was a "sync beep". Didn't appear to be a bad splice job. Reel 3 has a fade to black at the end, followed by a couple seconds more action, then the reel change. If someone wasn't paying close attention they might mis-ID the splice. Maybe the lab eff'd up the sound there too. The movie is a pretty good thriller, not great, but good. For once most of the computer jargon in a movie rings fairly true. Diane Lane is good, didn't really recognize anyone else. I wouldn't highly recommend this but it didn't suck. 2.5 out of 5 stars. Q: You manage a 15-plex that has six box office stations. It's the busiest night of the week for you. There's a long line of people waiting to buy tickets and obviously some potential customers are turning around and leaving when they see the long line. How many box office stations do you open? A: Apparently four.  |  IP: Logged Dennis Benjamin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1445 From: Denton, MD Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-27-2008 07:52 PM                        Cue the music... "That's Entertainment, Regal Entertainment to be exact". Just an FYI - since the company is micro-managed, that's all the GM probably had to work with - according to his payroll budget.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-27-2008 08:00 PM                        There's something seriously wrong when a business is unprepared to collect the money from everyone trying to give the business their money.  |  IP: Logged Kyle Anderson Film Handler Posts: 86 From: Tyler, TX, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 01-27-2008 10:51 PM                     quote: David Stambaugh Q: You manage a 15-plex that has six box office stations. It's the busiest night of the week for you. There's a long line of people waiting to buy tickets and obviously some potential customers are turning around and leaving when they see the long line. How many box office stations do you open? A: Apparently four. The correct answer: A: you're not even out on the floor to see that there's a huge line, and you've never trained any of your "staff" (read: minimum wage retards) to have an awareness of customer service, so they wouldn't know to come tell you about it. SEMI SPOILER ***** At the end, she should have given camera the finger... !!!! *****  |  IP: Logged Stu Jamieson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 524 From: Buccan, Qld, Australia Registered: Jan 2008 posted 04-26-2008 06:34 PM                     The mainstay of maverick film makers like Eli Roth, Takashi Miike and Alexandre Aja, torture porn is now getting the Hollywood treatment. The trouble is, Hollywood doesn't have the stomach for the genre and the result is akin to Frank Bennett's cover of Radiohead's Creep: the words and the tune are there, and it's undeniably entertaining, but it's missing the rawness of the genuine article. It's too clean, too nice, too civilised to be truly unsettling. It doesn't look or feel dangerous like SAW or Hostel, films the like of which Untraceable clearly takes its influence. It's just a bit, well, gutless. The plot concerns an unstable young chap (Joseph Cross) who creates a website called www.killwithme.com (yes, it is a real site - click the link, it works), a webcam site where he submits unfortunate individuals to SAW-style traps with the gimmick that the greater the number of surfers who log onto his site, the faster the demise of his victim. Jennifer Marsh (Diane Lane) and Griffin Dowd (Colin Hanks) are FBI agents assigned to snare the unhinged antagonist. Given the technological nature of the premise, technical feasibility was always going to be a sticking point with this film and boffin cynics will find plenty to snigger and scoff at here. Also there are several glaring flaws in logic which are difficult to overlook and by the end of the film you'll be wondering how the Feds didn't put the pieces together much, much sooner. The film is essentially a social comment on the publics' insatiable appetite for the grotesque and the ease at which the internet dishes it up. This is certainly a valid topic worthy of serious discussion though here it is merely presented for the purposes of entertainment. Nevertheless, despite its numerous shortcomings, the film does succeed in being fundamentally entertaining and there are much worse thriller/horror flicks around at the moment, vis-a-vis Prom Night. 6.5 out of 10  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.