|
|
 
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Redbelt (2008)
|
Ben Goodman
Film Handler
Posts: 32
From: Danbury, CT
Registered: Apr 2008
|
posted 05-14-2008 11:50 AM
So I wouldn't say I'm a huge Mamet fan, and really I haven't seen a lot of his stuff-- I went into this movie because the trailer looked good.
To start with, Eijofor was absolutely 100% perfect in his portrayal as Mike Terry. There is not a single way I would change his performance. This guy is a movie star. Max Martini was above average, Alice Braga was above average, Tim Allen gave a surprisingly strong non-comedic performance, and Emily Mortimer was very powerful in her role.
Some parts of the movie were hard to follow. There were a lot of characters that came in without introduction or explanation, and sometimes I wasn't quite sure what was going on until later. There were lots of loose ends, and while some things fall into place, there was a lot left unresolved. This was a very narrow view of one man's life, and we only see other characters from his perspective. Is that a good thing? I'm not sure. Some people may like it, and I would probably enjoy it more on my second viewing of the movie.
Even with that said, there was nobody that I really just wish wasn't in the movie. Sure, I wanted to know more about the people I saw, but even in their small roles, everyone did serve a purpose. The minor characters were just plot devices, really. They were also embodiments of ideals, and really the movie is full of stark idealism. Good vs evil, honor vs greed, etc etc etc.
The dialogue was just so strong, as I'm told is standard in Mamet films-- everybody had something interesting to say. There were no wasted lines, no throwaway conversations, nothing like that. Everything had a place. Furthermore, there were some extremely powerful scenes that stuck with me after the movie was over.
As for the ending, well, I didn't want to like it. It felt very poetic, like something out of the Karate Kid... but while I didn't want to like it, I'll be damned if it wasn't everything I was hoping for. Intellectually, not the greatest, but emotionally, a home-run.
Overall I would say Redbelt is worth seeing-- but it probably won't be around for more than another two weeks, and if you're not willing to think, don't bother with it. There are some great action sequences, but the script is the real star.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
Printer-friendly view of this topic