my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Religulous (2008, duh)

Author Topic: Religulous (2008, duh) Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 10-03-2008 07:51 PM                        I haven't seen this movie in its entirety and I am certainly no Bill Maher fan, but the movie does have its moments. I certainly agree with the point of the movie, but I don't like how the movie itself was made. When peeps are being interviewed, it keeps cutting back to a camera which is way behind all of the others just so they can show a shot of the camera that is two feet away from Bill and guest. This happens often and annoys me greatly. I am also annoyed by the "alternative angles" that sometimes occur when Billy is talking directly to the camera and then it cuts to another camera which is also pointing at Bill, but he is still talking to the other camera and then it cuts back to the first one. I really despise that kind of shooting/editing since it looks very amateurish. Still, there are some genuinely funny moments and if you can stomach Bill Maher for 2 hours, it would probably be worth a look. This movie is doing surprisingly well. I thought we would have picketers outside being as it seems that most people love themselves some religion, but instead we can't sell tickets fast enough. Even 20 minutes after the show has already started, people are trying to buy tickets. Very strange! A documentary that definitely needed to be made... just preferably by someone else.  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 10-15-2008 10:47 AM                    I would like to suggest strictly for historical accuracy and the integrity of the Film-Tech website, that the actual spelling of this piece of crap appears to be "Religulous". Not that anyone cares, I'm sure. Have a wonderful day.  |  IP: Logged Chris Slycord Film God Posts: 2986 From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea Registered: Mar 2007 posted 10-15-2008 01:35 PM                     My main problem with this movie is that most of the interviews are simply perfect examples of straw-man arguments. For instance, it's disingenuous to label Orthodox Jews as "just as nutty as they come" then interview an anti-Zionist Rabbi as if he somehow represents Orthodox Judaism. Or interviewing another Rabbi who builds machines to do work for you on the Sabbath since he says that "in an emergency, you might have to do something." Or making fun of Christians because there's a group of them in Amsterdam who smoke pot as a sacrament. And in another, making fun of Christians by interviewing a guy who plays Jesus in a Passion play as if he's somehow a well-versed theological scholar? He's a funny guy and I liked his "Politically Incorrect" show but this movie doesn't cut it. I expected something better from someone as intelligent as Maher.  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 10-15-2008 06:39 PM                        I feel anyone who believes in any kind of religion won't enjoy it and will probably be offended for daring to challenge their beliefs. This movie is likely to change no one. People have to make that change on their own.  |  IP: Logged Chris Slycord Film God Posts: 2986 From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea Registered: Mar 2007 posted 10-15-2008 07:51 PM                     I don't even think it's that (though I am a Christian). I imagine there are plenty of atheists out there who would rather that "their side" be seen as doing something more substantial than making fun of people and would prefer intelligent dialogue to what's in this movie. And I wasn't really offended by the movie (few things really offend me). I was more disappointed by it.  |  IP: Logged Robert Crabtree Film Handler Posts: 91 From: Largo, FL Registered: May 2008 posted 10-17-2008 10:46 PM                     On the whole...I was expecting worse. While I knew he would be spending the bulk of his time interviewing Christians to make them sound like rubes, at least he attempts a veneer of balance by including some LDS, Jews, Muslims, and Scientologists in the scope of his scrutiny. And I did like the inclusion of the Water analogy. While a bit more time could have been spent with each of those other groups, I'm a bit amused that he completely ignored some of the wackier faiths out there. And an interesting coincidence to note, I saw this at a theatre that was hosting a Christian film festival.  |  IP: Logged Mike Schindler Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1039 From: Oak Park, IL, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 10-31-2008 01:07 PM                     This movie is highly entertaining and deals with some very important issues, and for those reasons, I would strongly recommend it. But as a movie, it lacks cohesiveness and a strong through-line. The film does not support its thesis very well at all. Instead, it feels like a collection of amusing anecdotes, with a semi-related message tacked on at the end. But altogether, it's way better than 99% of the crap out there, and I would recommend it to anyone looking for some laughs or some thought-provoking material.  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 11-01-2008 11:31 AM                    Now that's an endorsement if I ever saw one!  |  IP: Logged Mike Schindler Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1039 From: Oak Park, IL, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 11-01-2008 02:28 PM                     To clarify, the content was outstanding. It just happened to be a structural mess.  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 11-01-2008 04:02 PM                    Sounds like it's safe to say that Bill Maher is no Michael Moore.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 11-01-2008 05:41 PM                     Bill Maher is entitled to make whatever kind of movie he wants to make. I don't agree with many of his views on religion, but at least he has the nerve and backbone to stand up for what he believes rather than bend and apologize like so many on the left. Still, religion is a very touchy subject. I'm at least a bit slightly concerned for Maher's safety as long as he keeps beating on that subject in movies and his HBO TV series.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.