|
|
Author
|
Topic: RockNRolla (2008)
|
|
Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted 11-01-2008 08:09 PM
Like Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch before it, RocknRolla revolves around a group of small time crims who become indebted to a local gangster thereby setting in motion an intricate series of interrelated comical events which ultimately wind up in a neat, mortal conclusion. Where the first film had a pair of guns and the second had a diamond, the item of desire here is a painting.
Guy Richie's Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels was fresh, sassy and funny. Snatch followed suit and, being practically the same, was (obviously) less fresh and less sassy and less funny. The script was also less elegant but Brad Pitt was great in it and we enjoyed it nonetheless. Now we have RocknRolla and it's even more of the same but by now it's starting to taste a little stale and the elegant narrative economy of Lock, Stock is largely replaced with a series of interrelated scenes merely clunked together to form basically the same story yet again. The films intrusive use of narration to define each character only serves to further draw comparisons to the former picture. RocknRolla is still an enjoyable movie, however, but like a great joke that's been told for the third time, it inevitably pales in comparison to it's first hearing.
The performances are good but not outstanding, being merely on par with what you'd expect from a cast of this calibre. Mark Strong, for instance, had a much better opportunity to demonstrate his acting chops in Ridley Scott's Body Of Lies and Tom Wilkinson merely rehashes his role from Batman Begins. In Lock, Stock, Richie used performers who were unknown at the time (well, except for Sting and, to a much lesser extent, Vinnie Jones) which also afforded that film a greater level of perceived authenticity than is evident in this film. RocknRolla also suffers for having a dearth of appealing characters - there are no cocky, lovable heroes like those which drew us into Lock, Stock - and it's difficult to relate to any of the characters portrayed here.
While it's clear that Richie has a talent for this type of film, RocknRolla's carbon copy similarity to its forebears gives the overall impression of Guy Richie making a "Guy Richie" film and the promise of sequels implies that there is yet more of the same to come. Lightning may strike the same place twice but three times (or more) is stretching it.
6 out of 10
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.
Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004
|
posted 11-01-2008 11:10 PM
CINEMA: 13th Avenue Warren, Wichita, KS AUDITORIUM: 1 PRESENTATION: 35mm/Mystery Meat Digital/THX PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: Focus slightly soft RATING: Two and one half stars (out of four)
WARNING: "I'm dead, Pete. Dead people don't like Spoilers."
While the Friday the 13th redux trailer is playing, a long-haired brunette drops into the seat one off from my right. She leans to me and asks "This is the Rock and Roll movie, right? I don't like the horror movies." I assure her she's in the right auditorium and wonder to myself who decided they needed to remake Friday the 13th.
THE PLOT: Cons con other cons while other cons con the original cons. Wackiness ensues.
Long-haired Brunette, who spent most of the movie nervously tapping a cigarette box against her armrest, leaned over and whispered comments to me several times through the movie. I don't know why she didn't just sit next to me. At one point, she said "There isn't any rock and roll OR drugs in this!" Which isn't quite true, but clearly she misunderstood the premise. She was seriously disappointed. I suspect she was also seriously disturbed. She WAS talking to me, after all...
Yeah, pretty formula Guy Ritchie. It's not the easiest movie to follow, it has some funny moments, and it's not a complete waste of time. But we've seen this before from the same guy (no pun intended), and there's nothing new here.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|