|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Coraline (2009)
|
|
|
|
Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God
Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 02-08-2009 03:21 PM
Sean,
When Digital sound was introduced with the three competing formats, AMC announced it was selecting SDDS for all of it's theatres. Because most films are still being released with all three formats, I guess AMC never bothered to replace or add another type of digital sound system in existing SDDS venues except for their major theatres. When the Waikiki twins were still in operation, house #1 had SDDS-8 only but it's twin, the #2 was a SDDS-8 house as well as SRD. Consolidated premier theatres are now the Ward 16 with four of it's large auditoriums, #7 to 10 that has SDDS-8, DTS as well as SRD. With the exception of some of the other houses at the Ward thatmight have additional digital sound system, all of Reading's Consolidated theatres existing houses are still using it's original digital sound system as far as I know. Because I am not familiar with Regal's Honolulu theatres, I do not know if they have any theatres that have more than one digital sound system
-Claude
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008
|
posted 02-08-2009 04:42 PM
Here, once again, we have a 3D movie that has little competition. It's the only "children" movie of the top 10 at the BO and suitable for adults as well. It's the most valued and liked by the public. Here are the public critics scores from rottentomatoes:
First number is the 1 to 10 rating. Then estimated money grossed over the weekend.
4,3 - He's Just Not That Int… $27.5M 5,5 - Taken $20.3M 8,7 - Coraline $16.3M 1,3 - The Pink Panther 2 $12.0M 2,7 - Paul Blart: Mall Cop $11.0M 9,4 - Slumdog Millionaire $7.4M 7,7 - Gran Torino $7.2M 3,3 - The Uninvited $6.4M 4,4 - Hotel for Dogs $5.8M 3,1 - Underworld: Rise of th… $3.9M
Coraline is, by far, the most liked film, only surpassed by slumdog millionaire. Only Torino comes somewhat close to Coraline's ratings. It obliterates the rest of the movies currently on BO's top.
So little competition, good movie, good demographics (PG), no other 3D movie in the top ten, and yet it's only #3 for opening weekend.
Where are the "2, 3 times the gross of 2D movies" and the "$25, high profit 3D tickets?"
Of course when given the choice of watching Coraline in the same or nearby theater in 2D or 3D a lot of people are gonna fork the $2 extra to watch it 3D. Besides the novelty, they may enjoy it more. But when "all" theaters become 3D or when "all movies" become 3D ... then it's a non-issue.
If Coraline opened 2D only, people would still watch it in about the same number, but the truth is it would be hard to justify a $2 price increase w/o something like the excuse that it's in 3D.
But since 3D does cost more to produce and exhibit, it's only logical 3D grosses more as for profits to remain (about) the same. It would be different if all theaters could project 3D with only $1000 in special optics adapters and the movie grossed much more. That would be real extra profit. But if a theater has to spend $100k to do 3D ... getting extra gross doesn't necessarily transforms in getting extra profits. Just helping pay for the extra expenses.
Needless to say Bloody Valentine is mostly gone now at #16 and about $50m total gross. Pretty good, but not spectacular surcharges and all things considered.
I'm looking forward to watch this movie. I think it may be my cup of tea.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.
Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004
|
posted 02-08-2009 08:06 PM
CINEMA: Great Escape Omaha 16, Omaha, NE AUDITORIUM: 8 PRESENTATION: RealD Digital Cinema PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: Puny sound, puny subwoofer RATING: Two and one half stars (out of four)
I pull up to the multiplex and immediately find parking right in front. I walk in and not a soul is to be seen...customer nor employee. There is NOBODY manning the ticket booth. NOBODY manning the snack bar. NOBODY manning the auditorium hall entrance. NOBODY.
Through a back mirrored office window, I spy a girl flipping something in front of her face for her own personal amusement. I think she spies me, but she ignores me.
After about five minutes of standing around, an employee comes out of the auditorium hall. "Can I help you sir?"
"Are you selling tickets?"
"Had to take a bathroom break."
He sells me a ticket.
There's nobody in the auditorium, so I try out several different rows to decide where I'll sit. The screen is too high off the ground (like eight feet) and too far from the stadium seating to be any good. I finally settle on the floor seating. I guess we'll see how good 3-D looks from below the screen. (Just fine, actually.)
There's supposed to be a video pre-show, but nobody's bothered firing the lamp. When a woman with her five kids comes in, they turn it on...out of focus, crooked, and aimed to the left. Woman to her kids: "Oh no! We'll NEVER find a good seat!" Sarcastic, yet accurate. They sit in the top row. The auditorium does end up close to half full by the time the movie starts.
Before the trailers, the sconces kept dimming, then lighting up, then dimming again. They stayed on full strength during the trailers, which was really annoying for the 3-D effect.
Oh yes...Eventually, a movie was shown.
THE PLOT: A girl finds a portal to a parallel universe. Wackiness ensues.
The visuals are great except when fast-moving flying creatures appear...they flicker like the Atari 2600 Pac-Man ghosts. But it's a beautiful movie.
The story is aimed directly at the 8-15 year old girl crowd. It was fine, maybe could have been told better. There's a lot of stuff in here as visual fluff to extend the run time (like said theater scene, for example). It had that vibe that it could be brilliant...but just...wasn't.
Maybe I should go see this again at the Warren.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|