|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler
Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007
|
posted 07-15-2009 11:04 PM
I'm torn on this one. I rather liked the previous movie, and don't think this one stacks up, despite the sixth book being better than the fifth. I think the four main protagonists (Harry, Hermione, Ron, Dumbledore) are well developed in this movie, although Hermione and Ron take a backseat that betrays their relationship with Harry, as depicted in the previous movies and all the books. Dumbledore is especially effective, which is as it should be. Even Malfoy is well written.
Some of the other characters, however, get the shaft. This is a big deal, because this particular part of the story is entirely about setting the characters up for the home stretch.
Spoiler Alert - Click to Toggle
Voldemort, especially, is wronged here. Dumbledore completely glosses over the significance of the items Voldemort has chosen as his horcruxes. Just by the movie, you're left with the impression that Voldemort may have chosen a soup can to hold a piece of his immortal soul. In fact, his vanity and self-aggrandizement drive him to choose items of immense value and significance. Without this little bit of information, the quest left to Harry et al is impossible. Furthermore, Voldemort's character is done wrong by the omission of the key dialog from the book between Harry and Dumbledore in the cave. The relationship between Ginny and Harry also gets the shaft, which is harmful to exposition of Harry's motives in the rest (and also relevant to the dreadful epilogue from the seventh book. Here's to hoping they axe that in the eighth movie. Probably the most contrived bit of writing I've ever seen published, apart from Ayn Rand.). There was some other stuff that I think could've been better, but I think a lot of that is countered by the fantastic awkward atmosphere developed on the first half of the movie.
In closing, I think that, as long as this movie was, it almost could've been a bit longer. I think this one needed a two-movie treatment more than the finale, most of which can be covered by a montage, but obviously that wouldn't have been commercially practical. Also, there isn't really a climactic bit towards the middle to separate it into two.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted 07-18-2009 10:40 PM
It seems that the key to fully comprehending this collection of Harry Potter movies is in having read the corresponding novels. Each film has amounted to a greatest hits compilation of favourite bits from the book with the background details filled in by the book readers' own fore knowledge and enthusiasm for the material. Pity us poor non book readers, then, as we attempt to decipher the relevance/importance of the included set pieces and how they fit in to the central narrative. This sixth instalment in the series, Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, does not break this mould. Even the central premise of the film stretches credulity; Draco Malfoy is recruited by Voldemort to assassinate Professor Dumbledore, one of the most respected and powerful good guys in the wizardry league. Sure, and let's enlist a school girl to take out Dirty Harry while we're at it! Perhaps the justification for the believability of this premise is in the detail missing from the film. The book readers will know.
Another of the films great mysteries is why it is two and a half hours long when, frankly, not much happens in it. The fault lies in a sloppy script which contains little action but much soap opera and relies heavily on character dialogue to interpret the transpiring events. Given that the next book is to be stretched over 2 movies, be prepared for an even sloppier script. Maybe the producers should have hired Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh to look over the scripts given their success in distilling Tolkien's vastly complicated work into a script which, while taking extensive licence, was spiritually congruent with it's source? Indeed, had they sighted the Half Blood Prince script, they may have pointed out that having Harry and Dumbledore stranded on a tiny island in a subterranean lake being attacked by an army of Smeagols is perhaps just a teeny weeny bit close to a scene from The Hobbit.
Many lyricals have been waxed over how dark this entry is, and there's even a death in it, but when a crowded suspension bridge is destroyed in London and every soul miraculously gets off the bridge safely, you know the film really isn't that dark! Of course this doesn't stop the following morning's paper reporting on the "rising death toll"; apparently the Potterverse papers hold little regard for journalistic integrity.
Character development is virtually nonexistant, even after Harry beats a fellow student to within half a millimetre of his life, with the exception of a 3 second shot of Harry briefly considering the ramifications of his actions, his overall character arc remains unchanged. Every other character departs the film as they entered. Indeed, in retrospect, there has been little character development throughout the entire series.
However, despite this there are performances to enjoy. Jim Broadbent is particularly delightful, playing to his strengths as the jovial Horace Slughorn. As Luna Lovegood, Evanna Lynch's refreshing quirkiness steals all her scenes with her gorgeous ditzyness. Emma Watson and Rupert Grint hold up their end of the bargain and Daniel Radcliffe does what he can with Potter who always was the dullest character. Bonnie Wright is easy to warm to as Ginny Weasley.
As the franchise approaches the business end of its story arc and the Potter Lore correspondingly compounds in its complexity, the movies become increasingly incoherent due to their "greatest hits" mentality. It's as if a lot of critical details have been left out in order to make room for detail which is crowd-pleasing but ultimately inconsequential; a problem which compounds with each succeeding film; the deeper the lore, the more it gets glossed over. This will be a particular challenge for the last entry in the series due for release late next year which will need to draw all these threads, missing or otherwise, into an intelligible whole.
5 out of 10.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
![[thumbsdown]](graemlins/thumbsdown.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[splode]](graemlins/headsplode1.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic