Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » FAME (2009)

   
Author Topic: FAME (2009)
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-03-2009 07:26 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So has anyone see this one? I know the original really captured the mood and feel of 1980 and the music from it lives on to this day. This is another film I don't understand why they are remaking so soon (if at all)...yes, it has been 30-years but the original did not need remaking.

So...any reviews?

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-04-2009 03:07 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And to add insult to injury, they won't let the art houses play the Alan Parker 1980 original. It would be nice of they let us play the original; my market hook would be, "Hey, wanna see the real thing?"

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-04-2009 04:09 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always thought FAME was just a TV show.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-04-2009 05:39 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The movie isn't doing well at Rotten Tomatoes, scoring only 29%. Some critics say the movie seems more directed at cashing in on the High School Musical craze instead of being a worth remake of the 1980 film -which has an RT score of 95%.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-04-2009 06:04 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never really looked up old movies on RT, but is it possible that most people who rate an old movie are the ones who love it?

I remember when the original FAME came out -- I inquired about booking it, and our booker said "Sure, you can have it....if you want to have an empty theatre for a week." It just wasn't a small-town picture. I get the feeling this one wouldn't be much better for us, but we might wind up playing it anyway since product is so slim right now.

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 10-04-2009 06:37 PM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The sound mixer for the 1980 Fame went on to develop SDDS for Sony.
I was blown away by the 70mm 6-track mix for it!

The 80s showed a lot of promise with pop rock mixes on 70mm with Alan Parker directing both Fame and The Wall.

Seems most movies since then with pop or rock have not used the 6 channel potential as effectively.
The new Fame is barely worth mentioning.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Crabtree
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: Largo, FL
Registered: May 2008


 - posted 10-05-2009 02:46 PM      Profile for Robert Crabtree   Email Robert Crabtree   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's okay as far as I'm concerned, but I'm far more generous than most people will be. See Freshman sing and dance! See Sophomores sing and dance! See Juniors...and so on, with individual problems thrown in to create something of a plot. Never seen the original, but I think this is probably meant to a family flick.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-05-2009 04:10 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert Crabtree
but I think this is probably meant to a family flick.


And therein lies the difference. The original was in no way a family flick. It is a fantastic 126 minutes though. See it if you haven't.

This one's been wrung through the sanitiser so many times I keep expecting to see Bambi and the little blue birds on people's shoulders. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-05-2009 05:06 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I've never really looked up old movies on RT, but is it possible that most people who rate an old movie are the ones who love it?
From how the RT page looked on the 1980 version of Fame, it appeared they were rating the movie based at least in part on old reviews of the movie published at the time of its release.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-14-2009 12:07 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, we wound up playing this over the last week. It didn't do much business, but women from age 7 to 77 (literally -- my Mom was in the audience last night) seemed to enjoy it. The men, not so much. It gave the subwoofers a good workout, I'll say that for it.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-14-2010 01:23 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I watched the remake of FAME on Blu-Ray last night and enjoyed it very much. Yes, I agree that this new version is not in the same league as the original Alan Parker film but it was still very entertaining. I am not too much into pop music but I really enjoyed the selections I heard in this film. The picture and sound was excellent on BD.

3 out of five

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-14-2010 03:51 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, so was that something like 90 days from first run to home video?

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-15-2010 01:36 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just a bit over...it was released September 23. Around 113 days.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.