|
|
Author
|
Topic: Invictus (2009)
|
David Stambaugh
Film God
Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 12-12-2009 09:25 PM
Today at Regal 15 in Eugene, #9 in 35mm. The image had a slight horizontal jitter to it that makes titles look bad and probably doesn't do any good in general. Sounded good, loud enough and it needs to be played loud due to how some of the dialog is recorded.
This is not a great film, but it's ok. As a director it seems increasingly like Eastwood uses the same bag of tricks (including his collaborators on both sides of the camera) over and over again, and it's really starting to show. In Invictus he loves to again drop in snippets of inappropriate music at odd times. As usual recently the music is composed by him or members of his immediate family (Kyle Eastwood co-composed in this case). I really hate the overuse of obvious musical cues that are supposed to tell me how to feel.
Morgan Freeman's performance is great, as expected. Matt Damon is almost unrecognizable at first but he's good too. On the casting side, continuing with the nitpicking, it seems like Eastwood repeats here what he did in Gran Torino, using some non-professionals. They stand out like the proverbial sore thumb.
Spoiler Alert - Click to Toggle
Possibly the most effective scene in the movie for me is when the Springbok team tours the prison where Nelson Mandela was incarcerated. The cell shown in the movie, which is like 6 feet square, is supposedly the actual cell.
Like Gran Torino though, the whole is greater than some of the parts (or their sum), and the movie isn't horrible. I give it 3 out of 5 stars.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005
|
posted 01-28-2010 07:42 PM
quote: Tom Petrov I love Clint Eastwood and have most of his movies, but he needs to reinvent himself as a director. It seems like he is trying so hard to make a movie that will be nominated or win an Academy Award that it tends to get in the way.
I don't think his style points to him trying to win the Oscars, he's had a similar style throughout his whole directing career, but it didn't start getting Oscar nods until Unforgiven. And I certainly don't agree with the suggestion of him needing to reinvent his directing style. Eastwood is one of the most prolific directors currently active in American cinema. Like Woody Allen, Eastwood's progression (or, some might say, lack of progression) of directorial style from film to film is interesting to me, and I'm happy to continue to witness that progression to its finish (which hopefully isn't any time soon). Obviously, with an output as great as his (over 30 features) there are going to be peaks and valleys, to me that just adds to the overall ride.
As for Invictus itself, I actually liked it. Admittedly, I had higher expectations going into the screening, but it's been over a month since I've seen it, and my impressions are definitely more positive than negative.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|