Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Yogi Bear (2010) + Rabid Rider (cartoon)

   
Author Topic: Yogi Bear (2010) + Rabid Rider (cartoon)
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-31-2011 01:01 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This was not nearly as bad as I thought it would be. I watched it at the behest of my wife, who was far more interested than I was...and wound up having a good time. It has some good word-play, the female love-interest is EZ on the eyes, the scenery is pretty (filmed in New Zealand) and Aykroyd does a pretty good job of approximating Yogi's voice.

I was actually pretty impressed with Aykroyd and Timberlake both. Especially Aykroyd -- I expected to spend the whole movie thinking "Wow, this is a bad impersonation of Yogi Bear by Dan Aykroyd" but that didn't happen. He really inhabited the character, which is pretty surprising considering Aykroyd's got such a distinctive voice.

The dumbest part of the movie was the whole fireworks display scene. This is an indication the movie was made by big-city types and not real fans of the outdoors. Did they actually do ANY research about national parks and such? No forest of any description would allow that kind of stuff within 50 miles.

However, overall I give the movie a solid "not too bad." Which is pretty amazing because I was all set to give this a "really sucks."

I can't say the same for the Wile E. Coyote/Road Runner cartoon which precedes the main event. While it has a couple of good gags, it has a lot of problems:

1. It's too short. A classic RR cartoon would feature about 11 gags. This one has what, three or four? You're just getting into it and it's over. This is probably due to #6 below.

2. The overall look and feel of it is just wrong, all the way from the colors to the pacing. They should have used hand animation; these characters just don't look right in CG.

3. The Road Runner doesn't go "Beep beep" nearly often enough...he's just standing there or running past, most of the time. And when he does "beep beep," it's too soft in the mix.

4. The ending is bad, because the Road Runner normally never does anything TO the coyote -- Wile E. brings most of his problems on himself.

5. It's missing the faux-Latin freeze-frame species identifications for the critters. (Yes, I realize not all of the classic RR cartoons had them.).

6. There are no explosions. No TNT, no Wile E. trying to blow a fuse out when a stick of dynamite is accidentally tied to his face, etc. In fact, nothing falls on Wile E. either. (No wonder it's too short, the powers that be probably crossed out most of the filmmakers' ideas as being "too violent.")

7. The music wasn't so good. I realize there is only one Carl Stalling and one Milt Franklyn, but the music on this toon just sounds too generic. Bring back the "brassy" WB music sound...that's part of what makes a Looney Tune looney.

Having said all that, I will still say that (like the main feature) it was better than I expected.

Main feature: 2.5 stars out of 5
Cartoon: 2.25 stars out of 5

NOTE: I can't comment on the 3D effects because we played it in 2D. I was worried we might get some complaints about that, but out of about 300 people who came to see it over the weekend, only two asked if the show was in 3D.

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 01-31-2011 01:53 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah. That Road Runner short.
You are recalling what a gifted cartoon director Chuck Jones was.
Political correctness ruins everything.
I also didn't realize that Acme now sold Segways, or whatever those contraptions are called.
Seems they had one of these shorts in front of the Legend of The Guardians.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-31-2011 07:44 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
All of the current crop of 'Road Runner' cartoons are bad. There's not an original idea in them and they are sanitized to the point of idiocy. IT'S A ROAD RUNNER CARTOON!!! He's supposed to be blown up, have anvils drop on his head, fall off cliffs and have large boulders squash him. Have the people making them ever even SEEN a RR cartoon? Every one of these guys and gals making them should be forced to watch just one: 'Zoom and Bored'. THEN go out and try to make a real RR cartoon.

Seriously, it'd make Chuck turn in his grave.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-01-2011 12:02 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always thought it was great that the Looney Tunes characters were always being portrayed as being "actors" and movie stars and such -- everything from griping about their contracts or billing, to being shown actually being buddies after the "show" is over.

From there it's easy to resolve the concept that the coyote is not REALLY getting blown up or hurt; he's just acting in a movie and it's all done with makeup and effects. If all the concerned parents would think of it that way, the whole violence thing would be less of an issue and we could enjoy some good old fashioned new toons.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-26-2011 08:52 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Update: Thanks to YouTube I watched the other two of the most recent Road Runner cartoons. Sadly, John Wilson is right; pretty much all the comments I made above apply to them too.

I also found out this week that there's a single disk Road Runner/Wile E. DVD comimg out fairly soon, but DON'T BUY IT! It has only one of the good old classic toons (a McKimson-directed one); it has the three most recent crapfests, plus the Chuck-Jones directed "Chariots of Fur" from 1994 (a weak entry due to no explosions, again); plus the "Rudy Larriva series" of poorly animated toons that Warner's farmed out production for in the '60s. You have been warned.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.