Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Taken 2 (2012)

   
Author Topic: Taken 2 (2012)
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-08-2012 12:19 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The good news: It's a good action flick. Not overblown and extra-long like most action sequels. It doesn't waste any time and gets to the point fast.

The bad news: It's very predictable, and of course has plenty of the usual over-the-top stunts and antics by the characters. I hate it when a good guy is CLEARLY in a car/room/closet, but then two milliseconds later the bad guys show up and the good guy is just gone.....presto, he managed to sneak out of there somehow and hide where he can pounce on the bad guys and pummel/shoot/stab them.

It has a few of those classic situations where the bad guy definitely could kill the hero fairly easily, but keeps talking and talking and screwing around until the good guy figures out a way to get the upper hand. (What Roger Ebert called the "Talking Killer Syndrome.)

Then there is a fight scene, obviously performed by actors who don't know how to do a fight scene, or shot by a director who doesn't know how to shoot a fight scene....when that happens, it's time for Shaky-Cam! Thankfully it's over fairly quickly.

The story is more straightforward and has less of the horrific "what we're going to do to you" scenes than the first movie. It also quite blatantly leaves the door open for a part 3.

Having said all that, I will say it was a very entertaining 90-some minutes. If you can shut-off your brain for an hour and a half, it's a fun ride. Who woulda thought Liam Neeson would get next to Stallone, Schwarzenegger, Willis and Cruise in the action-hero lineup? Also, the girl who plays Kim (Liam's daughter) is e-z on the eyes, so that's worth a look too.

3 stars out of 5.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 10-11-2012 05:25 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like this movie quite a bit more than I thought I might. As you say, it moves right along and there's never any boring parts.

My favourite Liam Neeson movie so far is The Grey, but this one isn't bad at all either.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.