Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Riddick

   
Author Topic: Riddick
Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 09-20-2013 06:52 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So I have a question about Riddick. Either I missed something major (most likely) or there is a tremendous plot hole in this movie.

When Riddick is chained up and the chap with the sword is about to execute him (with everyone else standing around watching), nobody knows where Riddick has hidden those battery packs that they need to get the space ships going again. Therefore, if they let that chap go ahead and kill Riddick (as everyone is quite prepared to do at that moment), everyone else is going to be stranded on that planet.

Killing Riddick seems to be a really bad idea at that point, but none of the folks that are standing around seems to realize that.

What did I miss here?

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 09-20-2013 07:55 PM      Profile for Joseph L. Kleiman   Email Joseph L. Kleiman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As far as I know, the emergency beacon was still operational.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 09-21-2013 01:19 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If that was the case, why was it such a big deal that those two "nodes" went missing in the first case?

Additionally... who designs a SPACE ship with such lack of redundancy anyway? What when one of those "nodes" fail in outer space?

And... Pulling this one "node" out of the space ship also disables all long range communications?

I could probably go on forever on this one.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-21-2013 02:25 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marcel Birgelen

Additionally... who designs a SPACE ship with such lack of redundancy anyway?

What, you never saw "Apollo 13?" [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 09-21-2013 04:30 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, Apollo 13 did have three redundant fuel cells, nobody accounted for explosions to happen though [Wink]

So, experimental designs of about 40 years ago do have more redundancy than far-in-the-future space-age technology.

Heck, even modern drone technology would do a better job at finding Riddick than that eye-on-a-clunky-robot-arm they were using in this stupid movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 09-24-2013 09:54 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
there seemed to be quite a few plotholes with this movie, also the rape scene that abruptly ends/goes nowhere.

word is that the home video release will be an expanded director's cut with some 10-17 minutes put back into the film to make it seem less jumpy than the theatrical cut.

I quite liked the first half of the film , it reminded me of 'A Boy and his Dog' and 'Robinson Crusoe on Mars'

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.