my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)

Author Topic: The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) Sam Graham AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues. Posts: 1431 From: Waukee, IA Registered: Dec 2004 posted 01-03-2014 04:14 PM                        CINEMA: Moore Warren, Moore, OK AUDITORIUM: 9 PRESENTATION: Dolby Digital Cinema/THX PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: None RATING: Three and one half stars (out of four) THE PLOT: Greed and debauchery. Wackiness ensues. If you see "American Hustle" before you see this, you'll probably make comparisons initially. But about ten minutes in, you should forget "American Hustle" completely. This is classic Scorsese all the way, and it's just freaking great. If anything, you'll start thinking about "Casino". REALLY enjoyed this.  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 01-06-2014 04:11 AM                     This one clocks in at exactly 3 hours, which is 19 minutes longer than The Hobbit 2. It's a rather good sign that this movie felt a whole deal shorter than that Hobbit movie and any comparison between those movies ends right there . Based on true events, that revolve around a pink sheets broker called Jordan Belfort, which seemingly transpired across the globe somewhere in the late 80's and early 90's, Scorsese's black comedy doesn't bore you one single second... this is one heck of a ride. The movie got slammed by some critics, because of the tons of over-the-top profanity, sex, drugs, you name it. If you're easily offended and are unable or unwilling to recognize the satire, this movie is not your cup of tea. Spoiler Alert - Click to Toggle The real Jordan Belfort has a short cameo at the end of the movie. Additionally, many of the over-the-top events in this movie, like the sinking of the yacht in stormy weather are actually based on factual events...  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Goeldner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1360 From: Washington, District of Columbia Registered: Jun 2008 posted 01-10-2014 11:16 AM                     while the 3 hours seemed to fly by quite well, I thought some of the scenes felt redundant and unnecessary. Very good, but not as great as the trailers led you to believe. Was sort of shocked over the amount of nudity and sex was in this, you could see why the MPAA got all bothered and enacted a NC-17 rating (until some of it was toned down).  |  IP: Logged Pravin Ratnam Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 844 From: Atlanta, GA,USA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 01-11-2014 12:36 AM                     I actually thought this was Scorsese Lite and American Hustle far better. Both movies have flawed characters, except in this movie, every SINGLE character except for the FBI agent is despicable scum, and most of them are too one note to have a 3 hour movie about. Boiler Room had some of the same stuff and done in a much more low key and almost just as effective way. This is not half the movie Goodfellas was. The only common thing in both movies is the lead characters are mostly scumbags. This lead character makes the Henry Hill character seem like choirboy by comparison. And one of the sad things aobut the movie was the listenable but not carefully selected music score. It seems like songs were picked just because they had a good beat and didn't really add to a scene in some instances. I loved the first half of the movie. But the second half just does not deliver enough of a story arc to justify a 3 hour time. The sex and drug scenes were so repetitive that I thought I was watching the sequel to Fear and Loathing in Vegas. THough, I gotta admit the country club scene was hilarious and well done. I don't need to like the characters to enjoy a movie, but damn, you gotta make them more interesting. A douchebag like the lead character whoever this guy was like in real life is just not that interesting. So, overall a sort of fun watchable movie, but forgettable. It does a good job of showing the excesses of the scum who work in Wall Street and the excesses seem recreated in a realistic fashion. So the movie gets credit for that. Some of the scenes are like well shot bankers version of Cocksucker BLues. For me, certainly not Scorsese's best. Presentation: Regal Perimeter Point in one of their smallest screens already(screens 3 and 6 -both tiny). But in two theaters. Bad move by the multiplex. Why not show one of the showings in a slightly bigger screen especially with a 2.35:1 aspect ratio.  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Goeldner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1360 From: Washington, District of Columbia Registered: Jun 2008 posted 01-12-2014 10:57 PM                     won Golden Globes in the following catagory: Best Actor in a Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy: Leonardo DiCaprio  |  IP: Logged Terry Lynn-Stevens Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1081 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Registered: Dec 2012 posted 01-03-2015 03:54 PM                     Finally got around to watching this movie today in my home theater. The movie was pretty good and the three hour running time went by pretty fast. Not sure if the movie was one of the best films from last year, there were a lot of gloss to the movie and very little back story of some of the victims and such. I find it interesting that Leo is a mega-super rich movie actor who is playing a sort of mega rich dude, so I am not sure if was all that difficult to get into the roll. I thought Jonah Hill was pretty good.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.