|
|
Author
|
Topic: Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 01-21-2014 03:16 AM
It was the Sunday evening show at the Big House at a local theater. It was virtually deserted, seating only a handful of people, including me and my girlfriend. I must be honest, there wasn't a huge deal of excitement see this movie either, we counted our chances and those of a misfire were rated higher. The presentation itself, although, went down flawlessly.
For those who forgot who Jack Ryan is: It's a staple Tom Clancy character, being featured in many books and filmed adaptations. He's so good at being a hero, he even deserves to be in the title...
This movie although, is not based on a Tom Clancy book, it's just another reboot, using the Jack Ryan character in a modern setting as background.
He, our hero, is a seemingly bright PhD student, but after witnessing the 9/11 attacks, he decides it's time to do something for his country so he enlists. After almost being shot to pieces in Afghanistan, he falls in love with his rehabilitation physician. Jack decides that he always wanted to be an analyst, but who wouldn't be convinced to join the CIA as undercover agent if Kevin Costner himself invited you to do so?
The script is just standard 13-in-a-dozen Hollywood fare: Car chase: check, unbelievable computer hacking: check, cliched love story: check, I could go on for a while... It must have been lying around, catching dust somewhere since the mid 90's. After being rediscovered during one of the last Spring cleanings, it must have been passed to some of the most mediocre screenwriters with the task of resetting this thing in a "contemporary setting".
Chris Pine might be a somewhat believable James T. Kirk Jr., but he sure isn't as believable as some kind of undercover CIA agent. His single-dimensionally written character probably also doesn't help.
On a side-note: The cinematography also sucks. This movie switches from soft, grainy 35mm shots to razor sharp digital ones in the blink of an eye and also throws a lot of unnecessary shaky cam in the mix.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|