my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Pixels

Author Topic: Pixels Frank Cox Film God Posts: 2234 From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada Registered: Apr 2011 posted 08-02-2015 03:35 PM                        I don't know why this movie is getting a bad critical rap. I happen to be a fan of classic arcade games and have been known to make the odd contribution to mame before xmame was abandoned and folded into sdlmame. Therefore, I might not be the most objective reviewer of a movie that revolves around classic arcade games. Having said that, Pixels is great! Every night that I've played it so far, I go into my auditorium to watch the Centipede scene again, which really rocks in more ways that one. I thought I might be the only one that thinks so, but I've had several people come out after the show saying how wonderful the movie is, so folks around here really like it. It's getting a good reception from everyone, and there are a lot more little kids coming to see it than I had expected. One little girl was telling her mother that "I know what I want for my birthday! A big stuffed Qbert!" If you like arcade games and 80's rock'n'roll, you want to see Pixels.  |  IP: Logged Buck Wilson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 894 From: St. Joseph MO, USA Registered: Sep 2010 posted 08-02-2015 08:23 PM                     I also liked it. I saw it in laser/atmos so the colors were very vivid, and the sound PUNCHED. It was a good time.  |  IP: Logged Frank Cox Film God Posts: 2234 From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada Registered: Apr 2011 posted 08-02-2015 09:45 PM                        I do have two (minor) nit-picks. First, the movie is incorrectly titled; the proper terminology should be Voxels. Of course, nobody would know what that meant, so I guess Pixels is the better choice from that point of view. Second, there are no cheat codes in Pac Man. There is an integer overflow error on level 256 which exceeds the maximum value of the 8-bit variable that contains the current level number. This corrupts the screen and prevents the player from continuing past that level since you need to eat 244 dots to complete a level and only 131 dots appear on the screen. That's not a cheat code, that's a bug and it doesn't help you win the game; it terminates the game. Un-related to the Pixels movie, Donkey Kong exhibits a similar integer overflow problem on level 22. The time plus bonus adds up to 260, which gets reset to 4 and that's simply not enough time to complete the level. Even though they play Donkey Kong in the Pixels movie, there's no reference to or any need to refer to that bug, though.  |  IP: Logged Christopher Lani Film Handler Posts: 62 From: Ely, Nevada, USA Registered: Nov 2013 posted 08-05-2015 02:19 AM                        Is Pixels Flat or Scope?  |  IP: Logged Frank Cox Film God Posts: 2234 From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada Registered: Apr 2011 posted 08-05-2015 11:44 AM                        Scope.  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Goeldner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1360 From: Washington, District of Columbia Registered: Jun 2008 posted 08-05-2015 09:44 PM                     if this movie were recast and didn't have Sandler, James, and Gad - this could have been a lot better. on the technical side the 3D and the Atmos mix seriously kicked it  |  IP: Logged Matt Russell Expert Film Handler Posts: 142 From: Aurora, USA Registered: Aug 2015 posted 08-05-2015 09:48 PM                    I thought Gad and Dinklage were alright, it was just really Sandler and James who brought the movie down. Whoever thought the idea of Kevin James playing the President would be "funny" was clearly not thinking right.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 08-21-2015 08:21 PM                        Well being mostly a non-fan of Adam Sandler, I was fully prepared to hate this movie but thought the animated game parts would be fun to watch. Boy was I wrong. It was a hoot from start to finish, the visuals were awesome and Sandler was actually an appealing character. Plus the movie starts out with a full volume playback of Cheap Trick's "Surrender," one of the best rock songs of the '80s, so the proceedings get off on the right foot. The story is kind of sci-fi ridiculous of course, but I thought it was a way better story than any of the recent indecipherable Marvel movies. (I haven't seen "Ant-Man.") There were a few Adam Sandler trademark moments, like Spoiler Alert - Click to Toggle the biggest nerd gets the hottest girl at the end and a few basic errors in the game renditions -- like Donkey Kong doesn't fall down at the "Game Over" spot in that game. But overall, I thought it was great. I like that they left a few games totally out of the narrative just in case there's a sequel. (They could have a lot of fun with Defender or Asteroids.) I also think the credits sequence deserves a special mention. It was fun to watch and very inventive, both ends of the movie. We didn't watch it in 3-D but I would like to -- there are lots of things that seem like they'd be great in 3-D. Also the sound mix was tremendous, I thought. Even though I fully realize that this was really just a dumb popcorn movie and not any kind of great art (and I had a real hard time accepting Kevin "Paul Blart" James as the U. S. president, although I guess he's no goofier than many presidents we've had), I still had a great time watching it and wouldn't hesitate to watch again, so it deserves 4 stars out of 5 from me.  |  IP: Logged Stu Jamieson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 524 From: Buccan, Qld, Australia Registered: Jan 2008 posted 09-20-2015 05:39 AM                     Frank, you're a nerd. Love your work, man. Check your serious movie chops at the door, there'll be no need for those here! Pixels follows on from the likes of Wreck It Ralph and TRON, mashing up the real world with that of the video game. This time around it turns out that a video tape of classic arcade games was sent into space in the early eighties and discovered by aliens who used it's contents to model weapons with which to attack us. It all makes perfect sense really. Naturally the best hope for Earth's defence are former classic gamer champions who suitably proceed to kick all kinds of pixelated ass. Yes, it's silly. Yes, it's fun. There's enough pop culture references from the eighties to the tweenies to poke fun at both gens X and Y whilst remaining supremely entertaining for gen Z. There's plenty of visual gags, generation specific quips and some outstanding CGI to tie it all together and only the hardest of sardonic hearts could fail to be entertained, even if it were only the slightest bit. Adam Sandler, Kevin James, Michelle Monaghan, Peter Dinklage and Josh Gad are joined by some remarkable star power which includes Brian Cox, Sean Bean and Dan Aykroyd among a slew of other cameos wanting to get their face into a big budget movie. Most of the performers deliver their expected shtick and in a movie of this nature, there's nothing wrong with that. The film's climax is a fantastic exercise in classic game character spotting, incumbent with the obligatory in-game sound signatures which accompany each of them. Pixels is a mindless, fun blockbuster. Will history hold it in the same esteem as TRON or Wreck It Ralph? No, it's much more disposable than that. But it delivers more than you'd expect from a film which is clearly derived from a popular trend set by better predecessors. 7.5 out of 10  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.