|
|
Author
|
Topic: Green Book (2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006
|
posted 12-16-2018 09:35 PM
quote: Terry Monohan Strange many trade mags have this filmed in 2.35 scope but at both cinemas we have seen It in was projected at flat 1.85.
Between October & December I ran about half-a-dozen press & industry screenings at several screening rooms. (and I enjoyed the movie a lot)
I recall that before the first screening I did, somebody from Universal warned me in an e-mail that it was in a "funny" aspect ratio and that somebody would be checking to "make sure I showed it correctly"
(They also said that because it was a 'high-profile' screening they were sending two copies of the DCP and they wanted me to ingest both of them, so that I'd have a backup, which is, from a technical standpoint, impossible to do with two DCPs that have identical CPL's & UUID's)
Just for the record, the DCP CPL lists the aspect ratio as "F-200", and this note was included in the ingest letter I got with the hard drive: Since all my shows are run manually, and I have complete masking control, I simply adjusted the maskings & image size so that the 2.0 aspect ratio was correct, but without the 'black bars' top & bottom.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-11-2019 06:55 PM
We got a chance to see "Green Book" at an AMC theater in Seattle over the weekend. We went in literally knowing next to nothing about the film, outside of the article I posted here a couple weeks ago which raged about the Oscar win. Other than that, we knew very little about what we were going to see.
Everything about the presentation was perfect, including the lack of any commercials before the movie (we got in just as the first trailer was starting, so I don't know what was up there before the showtime, but I'm totally against mixing ads in with the trailers). Sound was good, picture was bright, lighting was great and seats were fine.
Having read up a little on the controversy about the movie since we saw it, I understand somewhat about where the gripes are coming from. BUT... the gripers are blaming "the Adademy" for "not picking the right movie." What the hell are the voters supposed to do? "Well, I liked Green Book best, thought it was the better film, but I'll pick BlackKKlansman because I feel it would look better to pick a movie that expresses the feelings/experiences of African Americans better from an African American point of view, even though I didn't like it as much as I liked Green Book."
What good is a "vote" if they're now required to qualify their votes like that? Thank God the votes are secret, otherwise we'd be seeing perfectly good filmmakers having their careers ruined because they "voted wrong" for Best Picture.
I get what the complaints are about, but I think they're taking the movie the wrong way. To me the story was about two guys learning about each other and both becoming better people for the experience. I didn't think it was a "white rescue" situation at all... it was a depiction of something that happened.
I saw some gripes that the movie should have been about Don Shirley, with Mahershala Ali as the star and Viggo Mortenson as the support player. But that would have been a completely different movie. This movie was about a relationship, not just about one person. These people are upset that the black guy was "second" to the white guy in the movie. It didn't strike me that way at all, I thought the movie was about both guys equally and their personal growth. But then I'm not black, so my opinion may not count.
Some didn't like the ending, which, as most people probably know by now, depicts Don Shirley being invited by his driver/bodyguard, Tony, to his family's Christmas celebration. Well.... if that's what happened, why not show that? I have no idea if that depiction was accurate or not. If it wasn't accurate, that's another discussion -- but from an "movie" standpoint, it would have been bad storytelling to have Shirley go home to a big family Christmas party, because that's not the kind of life he'd been shown to lead up to that point.
My wife and I both thought the movie was outstanding. I came out of there feeling horribly ashamed and almost in disbelief that our country ever had the types of racism shown, and also a feeling of hope that, current political rhetoric aside, progress has indeed been made. I also came out wanting to learn more about that period of history, which I have done some reading on already.
I would give it 4.5 out of 5 stars. I can't remember the last time I watched a modern Best Picture winner and thoroughly enjoyed it.
quote: Terry Monohan
My friend says you saw the limo guy toss back the stone into the pile and you heard it click. I guess he just put back in his pocket without showing it on the screen.
You see Tony "dip" his hand into the pile of rocks as if he is putting it back, but he doesn't toss it, and it looks kind of obviously like he didn't really put it back.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|