|
|
Author
|
Topic: Aladdin (2019)
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-26-2019 05:18 PM
Disney's latest remake is one that I was ready to be severely disappointed in, given the impossible-to-fill shoes of Robin Williams as the genie.
The movie is bigger, bolder, louder and much more elaborate (thanks mostly to CGI and the Disney costuming department) than the famous animated version. This gives it a "lumbering" quality, like it's trying to be fast on its feet but can't quite get the rhythm.
The story is altered slightly to give it more of a girl-power angle (complete with the now-required-by-the-policy-manual, Let-It-Go-style big production number sung by the female lead), and the writers are super-careful that neither gender is more responsible for the happy ending than the other one. This doesn't really hurt the story too much from an entertainment standpoint, but it does make it feel forced at times.
The songs from the animated movie are reused here, sometimes with altered lyrics, and a handful of new songs (including the big girl-power number mentioned above) are included. This, along with about one too many extended action/fight scenes, accounts for the movie being about a half-hour longer than the animated version.
The visuals are, as expected, dynamite. If nothing else, this movie would be a blast to watch even if you kept the sound off. And, as mentioned, the costumes are Oscar-quality (if this doesn't get nominated for Best Costume Design, somebody's nodded off at the Academy). The sound mix is excellent too, with the songs being especially tight.
As for the elephant in the room -- how does Will Smith fill those big shoes? Well, in the surprise of the year, he pulls it off. Some of the original material (mostly improvised by Williams, according to legend) is recycled, but some new stuff works well too. The bottom line is, I found myself wrapped up in the story and not longing for the Williams version, so that's probably a good sign.
So where does this fall in the lineup of current Disney classic remakes? I would say it's better than "Dumbo" for sure, probably just about on par with "Beauty and the Beast," but still not quite as good as "The Jungle Book or "Cinderella." It could have been maybe 20 minutes shorter, but I was fully entertained. I expect the nostalgia crowd and the families will be as well.
3 out of 5 stars.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|