|
|
Author
|
Topic: Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019)
|
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.
Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004
|
posted 07-03-2019 10:52 PM
CINEMA: B&B Ankeny 12 & B-Roll Bowling, Ankeny, IA AUDITORIUM: 2, SEAT: D11 PRESENTATION: B&B GRAND auditorium Recline-o-Vision with butt warmers and DTS:X and projection from freaking laser beams PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: I am not watching this all that far from home, so I'm probably doing it wrong RATING: Three stars (out of four)
THE PLOT: Avengers:Postgame. Wackiness ensues.
This is easily the best of the post Tobey Maguire Spider-Man movies, which has had like three different iterations if you count the animated "Into the Spiderverse" nonsense.
Parker and his classmates are on a summer school trip to Europe to see cool shit and maybe get laid. Trouble erupts and Nick Fury enlists Spidey to help. A plot twist Helen Keller could have seen coming ensues, and then stuff needs a fixin'. But it works because it's light and fun, which is sorely needed after the Avengers opus.
Sony did the last movie, "Homecoming", in cooperation with Marvel and Disney to get Spider-Man into the Marvel Cinematic Universe. This movie feels more like something Marvel/Disney did themselves, then handed over to Sony for distribution. It's that much better.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-24-2019 02:21 PM
Cinema: AMC Patriot 13, Lawton, OK Screen: #4 Format: Mystery Meat Digital (couldn't see inside the "boothless" protrusion at the top of the seating area). Presentation Problems: Strange house lights issues, crying baby. Movie Rating: 2 drones out of 4
For all the movie's high, certified fresh score at Rotten Tomatoes, this one just didn't live up to my expectations.
The big plot twist that happens was not surprising at all. What's bad is the big reveal took the movie from an other-worldly place that seemed fun down a level that was just surprisingly pedestrian and odd in tone. And when it went there the story just kind of fell apart for me. Too many nit picky things suddenly got called into question. For 10 years Marvel movies have severely strained the limits of suspension of disbelief when it comes to things like human-made technological gadgetry. Viewers can go along with a lot of things in a movie, but there is a blurry, brackish barrier the gee-whiz stuff needs to avoid. If credibility is pushed too far the story can get sucked into the bullshit zone.
We get the same problem considering the invincibility of certain characters, like Spiderman in this movie. I can go along with a superhero dodging a few bullets from one bad guy, or "Neo" in a digital construct of reality stopping hundreds of bullets in mid air. My mind can't help but wander off when I see a hero dodging thousands of rounds of ammo simultaneously fired from many computerized baddies who are chasing him. My thoughts drifted to real life military drones and how surgically lethal they can be, even when they're just remotely piloted by a fallible human on the other side of the world. I wouldn't think about those things while watching the show if the movie's producers didn't push their luck so much.
The only thing that saves the movie at all are the light, comedic moments throughout. The cast is pretty good.
I think the house lights were malfunctioning. When they lowered for the feature they flickered badly, with a bright strobe kind of effect before they turned off. When the house lights came back up during the credits there was no fade effect; it went from zero to 100%. That made it tough to sit through the credits to see the couple teasers.
One would figure distractions would be at a minimum for an early Tuesday evening screening. Nope. Some lady brought a toddler with her that was probably too young to watch a movie like this. The kid kept getting scared and upset during various action sequences.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|