|
|
Author
|
Topic: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 09-05-2019 01:47 AM
quote: Mike Blakesley I doubt we'll play this movie, in fact I don't think we've ever played a Tarantino film here... they just don't go over in small towns.
I'm obviously not running the show at your place, but I somehow think you should at least play it for a week if you can get that arranged and if you haven't done already.
I remember H8 only drawing only mediocre crowds, but this one has been a sell-out around here for a few weeks. In my hometown, it was shown in the big multiplex on 3 screens AND on two screens in the art-house across the street. It doesn't happen very often they share programming, but also the art house had sell-out crowds for about a week and had to turn people down.
I don't know why this movie draws bigger crowds than H8 or Django, but I guess people were put off a little by the Wild West theme. It seems to play to some kind of nostalgic feelings of the Hollywood of yesteryear, which goes beyond the standard die-hard Tarantino crowd. Maybe people that usually are scared off by violence, think this movie has none, since there is very little in the trailer... well, they're in for a treat..
The movie itself may not be Tarantino's best work, but is still pretty enjoyable, despite its length.
The narrative really needs some time to build and you miss a bit of the otherwise witty Tarantino dialog to get you through it.
The ending gave me some double feelings. Both hilarious and a high dose of melancholy...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 09-13-2019 08:07 PM
I saw the film 4 times. I obviously enjoyed it a lot. BUT, even though I know it is a Once Upon a Time story, there were some inconsistencies when t came to accurately capturing what Hollywood looked like. In the February sequence, we see a Hollywood Pussycat Theatre on the Hollywood Blvd. But Pacific's View (New View) would not become one for another few years. The Vine Theatre WAS showing Romeo and Juliet, though. The shots of the Vogue went by to quickly to see, however. In Westwood, though, the Bruin was showing The Wrecking Crew. At that time in history, the Bruin was a prestige first-run exclusive house, and The Wrecking Crew was dumped in a very wide city release. It didn't play Westwood at all. The Bruin was actually playing The Magus at the time. Across the street, the Village is showing The Pendulum. Actually it was playing the last week's exclusive engagement of The Stalking Moon, to be replaced by Joanna, a small billboard we do see in the parking lot that Tate parks in near the theatre.
Later, in the August section, Romeo and Juliet is still playing at the Vine theatre in its 8th month. It was still playing there, but in its 10th month, since it had opened in October 1968. Toys in the Attic was shown on the Pantages marquee, where the film had played its exclusive run, BUT in February, not in August (and a tv commercial for it was shown in the February segment during a Mannix program, but it must have been a local cut-in. AIP would not have been making national TV ad placements at the time. And The Night They Raided Minsky's was shown on the Vogue's marquee. Again, the Vogue HAD run this film, but it had ended the exclusive engagement in February, not in August. THen there is a billboard at the restaurant for the movie Candy. Maybe, but billboards are expensive there, and Candy had opened the previous December for an exclusive run, then went through the selected theatre run, and then the citywide run before probably showing up as a second feature here and there. Doubtful the billboard would still be up at that point. At least they got the Cinerama Dome correct. they were indeed playing Krakatoa East of Java. 2001: a Space Odyssey was still playing at the Warner Cinerama (Hollywood Pacific), but of course the Dome is more interesting in its cinematic look.
Also, in an interview with a friend of Tate's, she said Tate would have never gone to a party at the Playboy mansion. This is something that is provable. The mansion wasn't bought by Hefner/Playboy Enterprises until 1971.
This is all just for fun, Im not ripping the movie because of this.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|