|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Pearl Harbor - Booking, etc
|
Paul Konen
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 981
From: Frisco, TX. (North of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 04-25-2001 10:06 AM
Just found out last night (4/24) that our 24 screen theatre is slated for 4 prints of Pearl Harbor (Running time 2:55)Buena Vista was wanting to get preliminary schedules and house placements so that final bookings could be placed. Some theatres were confirmed with 'X' prints with 'X+1' available if BV thought the scheduling could allow the extra print. This probably explains why the Drive-Ins will be late. All the prints are taken by the regular theatres until first of multiple prints are dropped after week 2. They are looking for $300M take. Paul.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 777
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 04-26-2001 08:18 AM
For drive-in fans, you could say that the "medium is the message", we'll show up for many movies that we wouldn't go to otherwise, just for a night out under the sky. And really, we expect that most films we won't see off the break (especially when 5 or 6 good films all break within a couple weeks), so "Pearl Harbor" I'll look forward to in August and be happy with "Driven" opening outdoors on the break. But enough about me, here's an interesting article, I think BV's policies are going to hurt the small indoors more. It's ! Look at the beautiful theatre in the article (Senator in Baltimore). A damn shame, this is the kind of place movies SHOULD break! www.senator.com/PDF/Pearl_Harbor_NY_Times_Story.html
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Madsen
Film Handler
Posts: 58
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 05-13-2001 08:36 PM
This article in Friday's USA Today sounds like it's talking about the letter referenced in this thread. "Disney's plans for its big summer action/love story, Pearl Harbor, have left some theater operators befuddled. The studio sent them a letter outlining how the film, starring Ben Affleck, Kate Beckinsale and Josh Hartnett, was to be shown.
''They do have certain requirements,'' says Bob Bagby, who runs the Missouri-based B+B Theatres. Among the letter's points, which Bagby says are the most wide-ranging since Star Wars, Episode I: The Phantom Menace: The three-hour film should start during the 7 p.m. or 8 p.m. prime-time hours and play in the largest auditoriums. Disney distribution chief Chuck Viane, who confirms this column's earlier report that drive-ins will not be allowed to show Harbor for at least a month after it opens May 25, says some theater operators misunderstood the letter. ''There's no blanket policy,'' Viane says. ''But we have as good a movie as anyone, and we do want the biggest houses we can get.'' While some theater operators have privately groused that the demands are tough in an extremely competitive season, Bagby and others say Disney's requests -- regardless of whether they are demands or suggestions -- are a small price to pay to get the movie. ''We believe this is going to be one of the biggest movies of the year and possibly one of the very biggest movies of all time,'' says Brian Callaghan of the General Cinema theater chain. ''It's a movie with a Titanic level of interest.''
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.
Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 05-15-2001 01:44 PM
If you ask just about anyone at a drive-in why they're there, the response will likely be that they're not there for the specific movie, but for the atmosphere. No pun intended.Historically, there have even been drive-ins that never even placed the feature's title in their newspaper ad. Instead, they mentioned coming out early for the playground or the volleyball or the burgers or whatever. When it got too dark to play, they just happened to show a movie. But that's another thread. Of course, results may vary by market.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|