|
|
Author
|
Topic: LCD Projectors for advertising
|
|
Tom Sauter
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 163
From: Buffalo, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2000
|
posted 09-28-2001 11:01 AM
It can definitely be nice if done right, no fussing with slides, etc. You'll have to be clear on who is responsible for maintenance of the projector, however, since you may be looking at $300-$500 for a new bulb every 1000-2000 hours or upwards of $5000 for a toasted light engine. I haven't encountered a screen advertising company that does this yet, but we produce our own in-house preshow ads digitally as it saves a lot of time and we have the LCD projector anyway. I know of several venues that have been doing video trailers for quite some time, which saves the projectionist major headaches. Just pop in a new tape and its done! Here's how I would break down the issues:The tradeoffs: -slides have higher resolution -video projectors tend to be brighter than standard slide projectors these days -video projectors stay in focus; slide projectors get knocked out of whack -video projectors more expensive to maintain -customers may not like sitting through real TV commercials The benefits: -full motion video and audio in one nice package -gives you the option of screening videos for special presentations (conferences, lectures, etc.)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Will Morrow
Film Handler
Posts: 91
From: Mt. Pleasant, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 09-29-2001 09:13 PM
We have this setup in one of our 11 houses. It is definately prefered over the slides, both visually and from an operational standpoint. We don't have it automated yet, like the slide projectors, so we just turn it on when we thread the projector. One night I threw "Requium For a Dream" in the DVD player, and switched the DLP to "wide screen" mode, and it wasnt near as bad as I had expected. If I didn't have to worry about the hours on the bulb, I would do movie night in house 1 at work, instead of at home on my 27inch Samsung TV. LOL It was tolerable, to say the least...and this is a Hitachi, that cost the advertising company about $3000.00 dollars I believe. It is mounted up in the booth in the same location as the slide projectors in the other houses.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-01-2001 04:57 PM
You would think that one of the advantages of using an LCD or DLP data projector would be that the material could be updated more easily across many theatres than with slides.
Actually, I think that the idea of using electronic projection for advertisements is a pretty good one, provided that a) the on-screen image is bright, large, and readable, b) advertisements continue the format of slides (still pictures, no annoying animation, etc.), and c) that the projectors are maintained well over time.
In practice, the problem would be that the projectors and bulbs are horrendously expensive compared with slides (though probably comparable to xenon slide projectors) and yet the revenue that they generate is the same. Also, slide projectors are fairly low maintenance devices and are cheap enough that spares can be kept in the booth in a multiplex environment if needed.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|