|
|
Author
|
Topic: Professional Ethics
|
Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 09-30-2002 05:03 AM
This is a contination of the Would you do this? thread. I apologise to both Manny and Brad for not having made the subject matter clearer in my original post.Returning to the principal point of my original post, is there such a thing as a cinema code of conduct either here in Australia or overseas? If not, do you think there is some merit in the idea of there being one? It would seem to solve many of the problems that I mentioned in my original post and would also set a defined standard for acceptable ethical conduct in the context of cinemas. We have standards for screen luminosity, film gauge and sound quality - why not presentation ethics? cheers Peter
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"
Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 09-30-2002 08:59 AM
Sometimes, all you can do is point out that there is a problem and leave it up to management to determine whether to run the show or not. Joe is absolutely correct. All too often, theatre management decides that a problem isn't a big deal. They write: "the show was only off-screen for 5 minutes" in the log book. I have also seen: "Only four people requested refunds." Meanwhile, if there's a shortage of hot dog relish on a Sunday evening they will send somebody out to locate a convenience store right away. Should there be presentation standards? Well, okay, there are already standards, so I guess we're talking about "enforceable" standards. My guess is that it will depend largely on who you ask. I think there ought to be a set of specified standards referenced in the distributor/exhibitor agreements. However, I'm willing to bet that many theatre owners would totally freak out if that was ever attempted. ~Manny. I'm always hacked off.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"
Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 09-30-2002 05:37 PM
Okay...Maybe I should've simply stated that sometimes the decision is beyond the projectionist's control.But I feel that what Michael is saying actually highlights another layer to the problem. Namely, that quite often the people who are making these kinds of important decisions are not actually on-hand to witness the results of their decision-making. For instance, it's very easy to say "the show must go on" if you don't have to lift a finger to put the show on...or if you're nowhere near the angry mob that comes out looking for refunds when the presentation sucks. I'll add to this and suggest that we've got too many "business people" and not enough "show people" in show business today. As for the customers not seeming to care about the presentation...It's probably a function of geography and/or demographics, so I won't agree or disagree with the statement. However, I will say that I believe there has been a steady decline in presentation standards and, hence, the general public has gradually become more and more tolerant of projection problems. Then again, maybe that is cultural, too: It's probably a safe bet that a large portion of the moviegoing population actually gives a damn about the presentation standards in Burbank, Beverly Hills, Hollywood and Los Angeles.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"
Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 10-01-2002 07:33 AM
Okay, Mike...but we need to level out the playing field.It's unfair to compare a scratch in the film or "just mono today" to the whole popcorn machine being dead. It's more fair to compare the significance of the projector breaking down to the popcorn popper breaking down. You could, however, compare something like the film going a little out-of-frame for an entire reel (or a delayed lens change) to something along the lines of "we're using Flavacol instead of Savoral" or "we have to use the canola oil today." Those are closer in nature because you still have the product...just not the way you usually offer it. How far from standard can your popcorn stray before your customers get angry about it? What about the movie? Would you still say that they seem to care more about the popcorn?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"
Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 10-01-2002 12:36 PM
Been there, done that.I used to give all of the incomming managers an entire month of training during their regular training period. Less than a year later, they can't remember how to thread because they are uniformly disinterested in doing it and, hence, staying in practice. They also tended to break things during their training period and I never got the impression that anyone was making it mandatory that they excel in that area. They came in and played along and then that was it. Nearly all of the managers are now banned from operating the booth equipment at their theatres. The only exception is the manager who actually worked her way from being an usher/concessionist through projection and then became a manager. There is a hefty penalty surcharge if any of the other managers are involved in a projection mishap that I am called in to handle.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|