my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » NY Times Articles on Theatre Quality and Widescreen Movies

Author Topic: NY Times Articles on Theatre Quality and Widescreen Movies Martin Brooks Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 900 From: Forest Hills, NY, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 08-09-2003 04:38 PM                        Tomorrow's NY Times (Aug 10) has two articles of note in the Arts section (section 2). The articles don't seem to be online as yet. I suppose they'll be up tomorrow. One is about the Angelica, "the house filmgoers love to hate." It talks about how the art house has "long lines, small screens, muddy sound and squeezed seats" as well as noise from the subway. The article talks about art-house alternatives, such as the recently opened Sunshine a few blocks away, the theatres at the Brooklyn Academy of Music (but notes how BAM has problems getting films since it's not in Manhattan) and the soon to be renovated Waverly, which is being taken over by IFC. The other article, "Why It's A Wide Wide Wide Wide Screen" talks about how with the advent of television, the aspect ratio of movies increased and therefore, old (1.33) movies look better on traditional TV than more recent films. But the article gets a lot wrong. It implies that all anamorphic films are 2.66:1 (the original CinemaScope ratio) and it never even mentions 1.85:1. The article was written to coincide with two widescreen film festivals, one at the Museum of the Moving Image and another at Lincoln Center's Walter Reade Theater.  |  IP: Logged Josh Jones Redhat Posts: 1207 From: Plano, TX Registered: Apr 2000 posted 08-09-2003 09:31 PM                        It seems to me you can count on the media for two things: getting it wrong and bias. Just my two cents..... Josh  |  IP: Logged Gerard S. Cohen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 975 From: Forest Hills, NY, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 08-10-2003 10:34 AM                     Martin's Links: "The House Filmgoers Love to Hate [Angelica Film Center]" by Jesse McKinley: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/10/movies/10MCKI.html "Why It's a Wide Wide Wide Wide Screen" by A. O. Scott http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/10/movies/10SCOT.html  |  IP: Logged Charles Everett Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1470 From: New Jersey Registered: May 2001 posted 08-10-2003 12:50 PM                     As is typical with the NY Times they didn't check their facts before writing the story. The Angelika upgraded to digital sound in order to open The Matrix Reloaded. Also, the Angelika has to share product with the UA Union Square and (on occasion) the Loews Village VII. UA just opened Le Divorce while Loews opened The Magdalene Sisters. When the BAM Rose Cinemas opened in 1998 City Cinemas tried to keep BAM from playing films that were in the Angelika. BAM sued and won, correctly stating that Brooklyn was outside the Angelika's booking zone. BAM now has no trouble getting product -- it opened Seabiscuit day-and-date with mainstream theaters. Has the NY Times reported on City Cinemas' lawsuit against Regal and Loews? Because of that lawsuit, Fox and Universal have taken City Cinemas off service AFAIK. [ 08-13-2003, 01:18 PM: Message edited by: Charles Everett ]  |  IP: Logged Martin Brooks Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 900 From: Forest Hills, NY, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 08-10-2003 07:30 PM                        If you read the entire article, you'll see that it does state that the Angelica upgraded the sound. It states that complaints triggered a $1 million renovation last year that included new seats, better sound equipment, improved bathrooms and air conditioning. Although I haven't been there since the renovation, the noise from the subway alone makes it suck and there are still other problems with the place. The thrust of the article is that the Angelica faces increased competition from the Sunshine and the forthcoming IFC theater (replacing the Waverly) as well as the Film Forum, Lincoln Plaza and Walter Reade.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.