|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Overtime compensation laws
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 11-28-2003 11:49 AM
I read an article in the local paper a while back where a parent wrote in asking if her daughter should be paid overtime since they were working her 45+ hours a week at the movie theater.
The columnist (in the business section) replied that places such as Disneyworld and other "attraction" venues ARE exempt, but movie theaters are not. At least, that's what the state law says.
All the corporate and manager types like to think of their theaters as "a snack bar that happens to show movies" then so be it, and pay me overtime. If not, then make up your mind.
Regal paid me overtime, but Carmike did not, so I made it VERY clear that I refused to work overtime if I wasn't going to be compensated for it. It worked out for the most part, but I ended up having to leave a few shifts early at the end of the week.
Sorry folks, this is time out of my life that I'm giving up to make you money. If you don't want to pay me extra for staying extra, then I won't...
=TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 11-29-2003 08:23 AM
SC is a 'no overtime pay' state also. No overtime pay meaning no 1.5x pay rate after 40 hours. I was under the impression that NC was also, but a few years ago (3-4) parents of a UA employee in Wilmington, NC sued the company after their kid did not receive OT pay. They won the judgement and OT pay was retroactive for him for the time that he had worked OT. I'm not sure what happened with anyone else whom had worked OT with UA in NC. I have employees who hit around 40 a week and I have exchange students who ask for 65/week. While I can hear soem of you screaming at how unfair that may be, it is their choice to work such as they pay to come here and seemingly are quite happy to work at the theatre for me, or at least they "act" that way..
I'm almost 100% sure that if we were required to pay OT there would not be a soul who would get more than 39 hours. You know, like Wal-Mart. Keep the hours down and skirt bennies...
To clarify what TMP commented about Carmike... he received pregular hourly wages for OT hours worked, he just didn't recieve an accelerated wage. Soem like it, some don't but we all know that most of us aren't in the exhibition end of the business for the money now, are we?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|