|
|
 
|
|
Author
|
Topic: LA police use night vision binoculars to catch camcorder pirates!
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 04-15-2004 06:59 AM
quote:
Two arrests under camcorder law
Los Angeles police have made the first arrests under a new law targeting pirates who use camcorders in cinemas. Ruben Centero Moreno, 34, was arrested after the projectionist used night vision goggles to spot video cameras.
And Min Jae Joun, 28, was arrested on suspicion of recording a screening of The Passion of the Christ on 10 April. Jack Valenti, president of the Motion Picture Association of America, said he hoped it would "send a clear signal such crimes will not be tolerated". "In both cases, the LAPD's fine work would not have occurred without the swift actions of the employees of Pacific Theatres," he told the Hollywood Reporter magazine.
Federal authorities estimate the illegal copying of films costs the entertainment industry as much as $3bn (£1.7bn) a year. The MPAA has established a nationwide telephone hotline for cinema employees to report violations. Studios and cinemas are also investing in metal detectors and night-vision goggles.
Mr Moreno was arrested on 12 April after a screening of The Alamo at the Pacific Winnetka Theatre in the Chatsworth area. No hearing date has yet been set. Mr Joun was arrested after another audience member complained about a red light on a camcorder at the Pacific Theatre at the Grove. He was released on bail and ordered to appear at a hearing on 5 May. If convicted, both men face up to 12 months in jail.
The California anti-camcorder law, which came into force on 1 January, makes it an offence to take a camcorder into a cinema with the intent of taping a movie. Similar laws are on the statute books in nine other US states and the District of Columbia.
The new laws enable local authorities to act on offences that would normally be considered violations of federal copyright law. The MPAA claims that between May 2002 and May 2003, over 50 major movie titles were "stolen" by camcording before their US cinema release. MPAA spokesman Matthew Grossman said many illegal recordings were obtained by people who sneaked into advance screenings held for film critics.
The latest arrests follow that of Chicago resident Russell Sprague, who pleaded guilty to copyright infringement earlier this week after being charged of illegally copying movie preview tapes, known as screeners. The 51-year-old faces up to three years in prison for creating pirate copies of films including Mystic River, Kill Bill Volume I and Seabiscuit. But his sentencing has been postponed for six months to allow the movie studios to calculate the losses incurred.
Link to story.
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 04-15-2004 09:09 AM
At the ShoWest Anti-Piracy seminar, it was announced that NATO and the MPAA have been very successful in getting states to enact laws making use of cameras to copy movies in a theatre a criminal offence. Although copyright laws do exist, local police are not always able to make an arrest for copyright violation, so specific state and local laws prohibiting use of cameras in a theatre are needed.
States that already have laws include CA, NY, PA, WI, and OH. Laws are pending in TN, WA, VA, and other states.
Reward programs for employees and audience members who report piracy attempts leading to convictions also are being successfully used to catch pirates.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 04-20-2004 02:18 AM
quote:
There are also some areas of the world where "legitimate" copies take months to reach theatres or home video, and others where they never are officially available (or are heavily censored).
Yes, but you would have thought that the Internet would have reduced that problem significantly.
I remember browsing a video shop in Paris during a visit in the late '90s (just after the Channel Tunnel fire, so it would have been '96 or '97), and asking an assistant if they had copies of one or two French films which were totally unavailable in the UK. She didn't; but upon hearing my English accent pointed out that she did have A Clockwork Orange. I declined the offer, saying that I wasn't much of a Kubrick fan. She explained that the reason she'd mentioned it was that for some reason, she sold around 50 copies of that video per week, almost all of them to English tourists. The French distributor had even released it on PAL VHS and without French subtitles to meet the demand.
I explained to her that this was probably because of Kubrick's self-imposed ban on the film, which he could only impose in the UK because he only controlled the UK rights. Add to that a large number of teenagers and students for whom the ultimate 'bragging right' was to have seen - or even better, own a copy of - this film, and she had a nice little business going there.
The point of this anecdote is that in the western world at least, censorship need not be an incitement to piracy. Probably around half my DVD collection is imported from abroad, most of them ordered through Amazon or Facets. In some cases, this was simply because the US versions were cheaper than the British ones, had better extras, or were better transfers (e.g. not panned and scanned).
Granted, you would probably have a bit more trouble sitting at your PC in downtown Tehran trying to order a copy of The Sum of All Fears, but the anti-piracy drive we're talking about is taking place in California, not some backward Islamic dictatorship.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
Printer-friendly view of this topic