|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Blue LED "Sconces"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004
|
posted 01-07-2006 02:32 PM
quote: Bobby Henderson Color Kinetics isn't patenting LEDs and basic principals of their use
Well, yes they are. OK, not LEDs themselves, but the basic principles of LED use in entertainment lighting.
"Everyone knows" that PWM is the way to control LED intensity, but CK hold a patent on that.
CK also have a patent that covers using DMX512 to control LED lighting. "Everyone knows" that DMX512 is the universal way that lighting is controlled, but nope, CK have patented that.
There is plenty of innovation out there, and CK do some of that too, but these patents are not about advancing the state of the art. Given the choice, I'd shop elsewhere.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 01-07-2006 07:36 PM
quote: Brad Allen Bobby, what kind of life do these type of fixtures have?
If you left the LEDs on at full power and never turned them off any decent LED system should give you at least 10 to 12 years of life. Naturally no one is going to leave the things on at full brightness 24 hours per day. So its safe to say you could get 20 years or more out of a fixture provided no one vandalized it or impacted it.
Don't know about the life span of the computer controller systems Color Kinetics sells.
quote: David Buckley Well, yes they are. OK, not LEDs themselves, but the basic principles of LED use in entertainment lighting.
If Color Kinetics had a full corner on the market then a huge number of other companies making LED-based products for border lighting and ambient lighting purposes would not even be in business.
As far as the patents go, I say congratulations to Color Kinetics for getting them. The LED business is sadistically dog eat dog. What they did is no different than Dolby Labs patenting their technologies, or Adobe getting a hoard of patents for what they did in Photoshop. They deserve to be able to make a living off of providing a great product.
But if that is too much of a problem, I'm absolutely sure there's about 188,943,788 companies in China offering patent infringing equivalents for a lot less money. Lord knows our government could not care less about enforcing patent or copyright protections -at least when Chinese government sponsored operations are doing the infringing.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|