my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Finding Investors (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Finding Investors Brandon Henry Film Handler Posts: 20 From: Stacy, Minnesota, US Registered: Jan 2007 posted 07-09-2007 04:14 PM                     I am currently working at a 7 screen and a partnering 10 screen that have gone up for sale. I know they are desperate to get rid of these and could be had for a relatively cheap price. I am wondering if anyone knows how to get in touch with or find investors. I will have to put my stake in operating equity. Any help would be appreciated. Also what is everyone's feeling on the smaller independent cinemas surviving these days? The 7 screen is in a smaller town with no big name chains for 50 miles or more. The 10 screens is close to one 16 screen, but has been supporting itself the last few years.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-09-2007 04:36 PM                        Why are they selling? And why can it be had for a cheap price? To me, the answers to those two questions would be key to going ahead or not.  |  IP: Logged Brandon Henry Film Handler Posts: 20 From: Stacy, Minnesota, US Registered: Jan 2007 posted 07-10-2007 07:49 AM                     They are selling due to the fact that the managing investor has decided to move and pursue other business interests. None of the other investors want to be actively involved in the operation. It can be had for a cheaper than list price because quite simply they just want out. They tried peddling it to the chains in the area and it was passed on by everyone. To this point I don't know of anyone who has even been interested and it has been on the market for over 6 months. These theaters have been set up as two separate corporations and this too has caused issues. The ten screen more than supports itself, but under the current setup can't help out the 7 screen theater when that one is struggling during the slow times of the year. In talking with some knowledgeable people if both theaters were to be run under one group then it would make it much easier to have a succesfull business.  |  IP: Logged Andy Bergstrom Film Handler Posts: 44 From: St. Cloud, MN Registered: Feb 2000 posted 07-10-2007 11:30 AM                     Where are these theatres located? Is it a metropolitan or rural area? Thanks  |  IP: Logged Brandon Henry Film Handler Posts: 20 From: Stacy, Minnesota, US Registered: Jan 2007 posted 07-10-2007 12:30 PM                     One would be considered metro and the other rural.  |  IP: Logged Mitchell Dvoskin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1869 From: West Milford, NJ, USA Registered: Jan 2001 posted 07-10-2007 01:03 PM                     Either a location is profitable or it is not. If it is not, you don't want it unless you have a plan to make it profitable. Supporting it from the profits from another location is not a good idea in the long term. The reason the theaters are set up as separate corporations is so that if one location becomes extremely unprofitable, they can cut it loose and fold the company without risking the other location. This is a common practice with independent theatres. There are a lot of expenses in running a theatre that are not always obvious to a theatre manager. You need to see the complete books listing all expenses before you can make an informed decision as too whether you can make a profit. Also, when looking for investors, remember the golden rule: He Who Has The Gold Makes The Rules. You do not want to get into a situation where you are the managing partner but can't make any decisions without the approval of the investors. You will end up the equivalent of working for them with little reward for yourself.  |  IP: Logged Brandon Henry Film Handler Posts: 20 From: Stacy, Minnesota, US Registered: Jan 2007 posted 07-10-2007 01:43 PM                     In this particular case the decision to do separate corporations was based on the fact that there was a small core of investors overlapped each theater and then there was a another group that differed from each theater. I really think that the one theater that currently is underperforming can be turned around with some hard work and attention to detail. I am trying to find a way to come up with some seed money of my own, but just don't know where that is going to come from yet.  |  IP: Logged Charles Wierdsma Film Handler Posts: 7 From: Greeley, CO, USA Registered: Apr 2007 posted 07-11-2007 12:07 AM                    Hey over there in minnesoota. Are you asking about the small/independent theaters because you are thinking about a business plan for one? My first recommendation is that if there is any way you can buy their existing gear(maybe theyll give), think ahead and do it. Maybe you can use it in your potential place (or sell it on film-tech!) Are you looking for investment to operate the existing 7 or 10 or open your own independent in the area? I dont know the simple answer to the investment puzzle, but maybe you can see how the current owners feel about you taking an active role in marketing the opportunity. You may have success pulling interest from arts groups in Minneapolis, or even craigslist of all places. Either way you still have a job there and maybe a better one! I am interested in what happens if you can put it back up here.  |  IP: Logged Brandon Henry Film Handler Posts: 20 From: Stacy, Minnesota, US Registered: Jan 2007 posted 07-11-2007 01:33 PM                     I would be interested in purchasing these two theaters and am looking into how to locate possible investors. The question about the independents was just a query on my part to see if people still think it is viable to run this way or whether the corporate world has claimed another victim. I of course am in the very premliminary stages and will not move forward with out a very good look at the books.  |  IP: Logged Andy Bergstrom Film Handler Posts: 44 From: St. Cloud, MN Registered: Feb 2000 posted 07-11-2007 01:52 PM                     Is one of these theatres a former United Artists location? I'm assuming the 10-plex is metro and the 7-plex is rural? Thanks, Andy  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-11-2007 11:18 PM                        quote: Brandon Henry The question about the independents was just a query on my part to see if people still think it is viable to run this way Viable? Sure. There are thousands of indies around the country doing just fine, including the one I'm sitting in which is 76 years old. There are about 50 independent locations just in Montana. I would say the three main rules for being an independent theatre owner are: 1. Don't expect to get rich 2. Run it yourself - don't farm it out to kids (and get yourself a second job if necessary) 3. Make your theatre as nice as you possibly can (that includes the best presentation you can possibly afford), even if it means going without that new car or whatever, and it will pay you back.  |  IP: Logged Mike Spaeth Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1129 From: Marietta, GA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 07-11-2007 11:35 PM                        That's the eternal question...  |  IP: Logged Ramin Hashemi Expert Film Handler Posts: 129 From: Houston TX Registered: Sep 2004 posted 08-27-2007 04:56 PM                     Small independents can be very profitable. The factors, as mentioned, include competition, film selection and presentation, price, customer service, ... Competition include ALL other venues for spending discretionary funds. We have a first run triplex that does very well. The previous owners tried running it as a sub-run but failed. We simply switched to first run, significantly increased product quality, improved customer service, .. and oh yes, increased prices to match the increase in quality. It worked great, and still is.  |  IP: Logged Kevin Raisler Film Handler Posts: 52 From: Warsaw, IN, USA Registered: Jun 2003 posted 09-09-2007 08:09 PM                    I would think owning a theater in this present day technology-ever a-changing world would be a scary nerve racking experience.  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 09-10-2007 01:02 AM                     Concentrate your efforts on providing the type of entertainment your audience wants. Survey the community and don't be pressured either by the distributors or their advertising into playing what everybody else is playing. If you can afford the latest technology then install it. If not it's the type of entertainment your people want that's really important. A lousy picture presented in a digital format with digital surround sound is still a lousy picture.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.