my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Rules are meant to be broken? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Rules are meant to be broken? Ron Funderburg Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 814 From: Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA Registered: Nov 2007 posted 12-28-2008 08:02 AM                        Rules are meant to be broken? I have heard this statement all my life and do understand that it seems to be a real thrill to some people to break rules. I was raised to believe that rules were not meant to be broken, that laws were laws and that rules were rules and that doing right was something you just do. You do the right thing not out fear of being caught or because you don't want to be punished but because doing the right thing is how you are suppose to live your life. In the theater business there are reasons that film companies have become so hard to work with. Their reasons that film companies charge such high percentages for film we as operators like to say it is because the film companies are greedy or are out to break the theater. Those reasons may or may not be accurate but there are other reasons as well. A certain Drive-in is currently operating only on weekends they openly report their grosses to Rentrak and EDI for the world to see; however, at Thanksgiving and again at Christmas they have been open during the week but not reported those grosses to Rentrak or EDI. They have also opened films those weeks ahead of the national opening day. These special open days were only for their “special” customers who subscribe to their newsletter. Actually it is just that the newsletter was the only means of advertising used for these films. The other theater in town, an multi screen indoor, is aware of what the drive in is doing. They have not informed the film companies feeling it isn't their business to dobb them in. Film companies are aware of this type of actions and when one group does it they come down hard, pulling films or refusing to play films with operators for specific periods of times. They have been known to take the offending owners to court to try to recover unreported incomes. Viewing this as a third party, not activity involved with either operator, I am slightly appalled by the drive in operator. What he is doing is clearly a violation of the rules and clearly not the right thing. It puts the other operator at a disadvantage if he turns them in he runs the risk as looking to both the film company and the other operator as suffering from sour grapes. If he doesn't and the other operator continues the practice the drive in gets the first customers and doesn't have to pay the percentages to the film company. Of course, the drive in operator runs a risk of seriously jeopardizing his relationship with the film companies, could lose first run status or even the ability to book film. He would have to be caught for any of that to take effect. Working to his favor this drive in is a Podunk little drive in a tucked away part of the country so not really on the radar for the film companies. Now I realize that a lot of operators under report the grosses and I know that being honest is matter of personal morals; however, it is so blatant that it is almost begging to be caught. Would the film companies even care about this? I am guessing it depends on how the booker feels about the operator. See this little drama transpire I can see the reasoning behind a film companies attitudes sometimes. What do you guys think no big deal or is it a big deal?  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 12-28-2008 09:37 AM                        The moral dilema is: "Given that everyone cheats on taxes,causing the taxes to be too high, so you should cheat, too?" This problem, like middle east peace, will be around for a long time for all of us to ponder. Louis  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-28-2008 11:14 AM                     I know of a number of owners that have "turned in" the competition when he very definately knows and can proove the other owner is cheating.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-28-2008 02:30 PM                        Under-reporting grosses is bad, but opening a movie early for "special" customers (and then probably not reporting those grosses, either) is really outrageous. Ron, if you know of an operator doing this you should definitely turn him in. Sign up for their "newsletter" and the next time it happens, instead of just posting here, actually do something about it. Make a copy of their "ad" and send it to the film company involved. quote: Ron Funderburg Working to his favor this drive in is a Podunk little drive in a tucked away part of the country so not really on the radar for the film companies. The film company would still like to know. Even a little money, they care about. There was a theatre near here (now closed) who "stacked" another movie on top of one of the late '90s Star Wars reissue films, got caught, and was taken off service by Fox for one year. This in a town of under 3000 people. I think of the saying "rules are meant to be broken" as more of a joke, or when something unusual happens that 'just shouldn't happen,' than a real life fact. [ 12-28-2008, 08:02 PM: Message edited by: Mike Blakesley ]  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 12-28-2008 08:59 PM                     How about if a theatre, that is first run, has a special "reduced price" day to help bolster his business due to these recent hard times? Does this also fall into this scenario as well along with also the possibility of jepardizing his relatioship with the film companies?  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Weigel Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1062 From: Edmond, OK, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 12-28-2008 09:31 PM                     quote: Monte L Fullmer How about if a theatre, that is first run, has a special "reduced price" day to help bolster his business due to these recent hard times? Isn't that why the studios also have a ticket per capita requirement so that if you're ticket per cap is below the threshold the owner has to make up the difference to "pull" it up to meet it? That's always been my understanding.  |  IP: Logged Ky Boyd Hey I'm #23 Posts: 314 From: Santa Rosa, CA, USA Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-28-2008 09:53 PM                       Certain studios are very diligent about auditing and billing theatres that fall below per cap or exceed the allowable ratio of passes. Fox now considers any show starting at 5:30pm or later to be a primetime show. In the long run it doesn't pay to be anything less than honest as an operator. The studios are like elephants...they never forget a slight. As to the original issue of this thread, I agree with Mike, turn them in. The rules only work if everyone plays by the same rules.  |  IP: Logged Galen Murphy-Fahlgren Master Film Handler Posts: 405 From: Canton, MI, USA Registered: Oct 2007 posted 12-28-2008 10:23 PM                     Well, following arbitrary rules for the sake of following rules (or laws) is not necessarily doing right, but in this case, they are breaching an agreement they made, and there is no justification for that. I would turn them in in a heartbeat.  |  IP: Logged Dominic Espinosa Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1172 From: California, U.S.A. Registered: Jan 2004 posted 12-29-2008 12:26 PM                     quote: Monte L Fullmer How about if a theatre, that is first run, has a special "reduced price" day to help bolster his business due to these recent hard times? Ky was on the money with his response; if your ticket per-cap is say $6.50 and your general is $10 a $7 student night discount or something like that won't make a difference. It's all about the MLA. Me? I'd rather never discount opening weekend. If your numbers are lagging on opening weekend but your prices in general are competitive it's time to find a gimmick. Preferably one that won't get you turned into the studios... I'm with the rest of them, I say, turn their a$$es in! EDIT: There is a big difference between being competitive (competition is fun, brings out a good side I think) and trying to cheat your way through (no satisfaction!) Being fair is a necessity. If nobody had the gumption to chin check the majors we'd still be playing day-and-date.  |  IP: Logged John T. Hendrickson, Jr Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 889 From: Freehold, NJ, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 12-29-2008 01:10 PM                     We're talking more than "rules" here. We're talking "contract", and a violation of same is serious stuff. Rules might be made to be broken, but contracts are not. I agree. Turn them in.  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-29-2008 02:14 PM                        Sour grapes my butt....even if my competition is getting a break that I am being denied by a distrib, I will scream bloody murder. If he's breaking the law and huring me, I damn well will report him. Regarless of the moral issues, under-reporting or hiding grosses is criminal theft and should be exposed wherever it rears its ugly head. In the end, one theatre doing that hurts all theatres who are honest. And how does a DI get to play a picture before anyone else? Haven't we been discussing here the problem with the distribs sending prints only hours before opening date? Were does this DI get prints before anyone else that he can advertise and open it even for one day ahead of time?  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-29-2008 04:06 PM                        We got our Marley print on Tuesday the 23rd. I think this DI operator is just going on the fly: Print comes in, he schedules a quickie show, sends out the newsletter to his mailing list and cashes in.  |  IP: Logged Lyle Romer Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1400 From: Davie, FL, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 12-30-2008 12:26 PM                     If I knew a competitor was breaking rules like that, I'd have to turn them in. It creates very unfair competition. How can I compete if I'm following the rules and a competitor is having shows where his film cost is zero? That would be like if I owned a burger stand and my competition stole their meat for 4 days a week and I paid for mine. How can I stay in business against that?  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 12-30-2008 12:42 PM                        You are correct, Lyle. I have a nearby competitor who does not pay taxes; they just reform. Meanwhile, I pay my taxes. I am at a competitive disadvantage. (This has gone on for over 20 years.) Louis  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 12-31-2008 10:59 AM                        quote: Frank Angel And how does a DI get to play a picture before anyone else? Haven't we been discussing here the problem with the distribs sending prints only hours before opening date? He's probably just "inviting" people to his Wednesday and/or Thursday night staff screening.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.