my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Digital Upgrade Suprise Costs!

Author Topic: Digital Upgrade Suprise Costs! Rick Deleau Film Handler Posts: 13 From: Portage la Praire, MB, Canada Registered: Mar 2007 posted 05-20-2009 08:44 PM                     Digital upgrade very expensive!! I just spent alot of money upgrading one of my 5 screens to Digital with 3D capability, only to find that one of the Film Companies won’t supply me with a digital print unless all my screens are Digital. ( they might change their mind if they release a 3D movie.) So far Paramount has been the most accommodating with this transformation. With Paramount they are prepared to assist with the upgrade costs, providing some criteria is met. Disney on the other hand seems to be true to its form, Not only NOT contributing to the upgrade expense, that will save them money in film costs, shipping, handling, and maintaining, but because I am licensed with Real D I have to pay Real D a royalty, and in order to generate revenue from the Real D format, I have to upcharge the admission, and sure enough Disney sends me a letter saying they want a percentage of that upcharge. Before you make the transition to Digital beware of the Film Companies billing practices for Digital and Digital 3D. I am already into it up to my bankers eyeballs. This transition is going to get very expensive very quickly. If the Film Companies would follow Paramounts lead for the next 8-10 years, perhaps this transition would be well on its way.  |  IP: Logged John T. Hendrickson, Jr Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 889 From: Freehold, NJ, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 05-20-2009 09:08 PM                     As the kidnapper said in Taken: "Good Luck!" I'm amused about VPF's. Last February I was hearing that other studios were going to follow Paramount's lead and that some important announcements were going to be made at Show West. If we were all holding our breath, we'd be dead by now. And don't get too excited about Paramount's lead, either. There are a number of pitfalls in the VPF contract, as explained in other threads. Bottom line: The Studios want you to go digital and 3D, because at the end of the day exhibitors will be stuck with the bill. Hello NATO! Are you listening?  |  IP: Logged David Zylstra Master Film Handler Posts: 432 From: Novi, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 05-21-2009 12:07 AM                     The sharing of the upcharge was no surprise to us - we knew from previous experience that anything "bundled" with the ticket price is contractually bound to be split with the studios. Don't forget right now with RealD the studios are giving you the glasses for free - you may eventually have to start paying for those too. Your next surprise will come when you have to pay for upgrades to make your projector 100% DCI compliant (unless you have a commitment from your dealer to get you the upgrades for free).  |  IP: Logged Julio Roberto Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 938 From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain Registered: Oct 2008 posted 05-21-2009 12:15 AM                    Or when they start demanding 7+ fl illumination for 3D screens ... I honestly don't understand the distributors. All they have to do is pass on the savings on prints to exhibitors for 10 years. After that, it's a free lunch for them. Exhibitors still will be stuck with expensive to maintain equipment down the road that's not any better than the perfectly good 35mm setup they have now. But no. Distributors want to eat the free lunch now. Good luck with that. Everybody I've talked to around here says that, IF they make a SINGLE screen digital for 3D, they will make all the studios not paying VPF send a backup 35mm print as well if they want it projected. Screw them. If the print is already paid for, they want it there. If they are not going to supply a print, they want the savings passed on. At very least, temporarily.  |  IP: Logged Victor Liorentas Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 800 From: london ontario canada Registered: May 2009 posted 05-21-2009 12:32 AM                     In 10 years , will anyone have money to upgrade again... to 70mm maybe?  |  IP: Logged Peter Castle Expert Film Handler Posts: 220 From: Wollongong University, NSW ,Australia Registered: Oct 2003 posted 05-21-2009 07:30 AM                     OK. Here's a suggestion. Suppose your cinema uses Dolby 3D or XPand shutter glasses. You sell a ticket to your 3d presentation at normal prices. You then rent out the glasses at the upgrade price difference. (If a customer has their own glasses, then they could save the cost of the rental - and the cinema would not have any security issues.) A customer can, if they want, watch the film without the glasses. What could the distributor do? (I would feel that any attempt to access that money by the distributor would be looked at as illegal, while restricting access to product would be also.) Any thoughts?  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 05-21-2009 08:54 AM                     Well, obviously they could either (1) decline to make product available to you (2) sue you. Perhaps they would not prevail in a lawsuit (certainly it's not clear), but I don't think you want to get into a legal battle with The Mouse. --jhawk  |  IP: Logged Julio Roberto Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 938 From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain Registered: Oct 2008 posted 05-21-2009 08:58 AM                    Works for me. A customer will be doing a similar thing. Glasses will be a separate item. Distributors don't have to pay for them nor will they receive any compensation for glasses' rent or sale. Still, tickets will be raised by just €1 regardless to keep distributors happy (.50€ goes to them) and to help cover the cost of the 3D equipment (bright lamps, digital projectors, screen, etc). But revenue from the glasses will be separate, optional, and not shared with anyone not involved with the glasses themselves. There is nothing illegal or shady about it and if they either don't want to make material available or sue it's their loss for sure. A countersuit would not look good to them in a competition tribunal.  |  IP: Logged Martin McCaffery Film God Posts: 2481 From: Montgomery, AL Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-21-2009 09:35 AM                        quote: Julio Roberto I honestly don't understand the distributors. All they have to do is pass on the savings on prints to exhibitors for 10 years. After that, it's a free lunch for them. The odds of any of the people currently employed by the distributor being around in 10 years approaches zero. Why would you think they would be thinking that far ahead?  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 05-21-2009 04:34 PM                     Rick, did you have to shoot your both BO and CONC prices up for any compensation of this install outside of "RealDumb's" lease requirements?  |  IP: Logged Rick Deleau Film Handler Posts: 13 From: Portage la Praire, MB, Canada Registered: Mar 2007 posted 05-21-2009 07:25 PM                     Hi Monte I left everythig alone. NO PRICE HIKE,,, I just added a seperate charge to cover the real D licence. Its just that the whole Digital thing could be so great for every one!!!  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-21-2009 10:07 PM                     quote: Rick Deleau real D licence Well, thats one big reason NOT to go with Real-D!!! Stupid, stupid, stupid lease deal on that system for all involved and you can't bring another 3-D system into that complex for those 10 years. Master Image or Dolby are the best and only ways to go for 3-D. And the Master Image System is supported by two boys right in Toronto! Mark  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.