|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Hey, Regal... the "FEATURE PRESENTATION" should be the FEATURE!
|
Mark J. Marshall
Film God
Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 02-27-2011 08:47 AM
The first time I saw this I thought it was just another CineMedia screw up. I've seen so many, I come to expect them every now and then. But I've seen it enough now to realize that it's actually supposed to be playing this way.
After the 30 minutes of pre-show crap that is "First Look", we have the newly revamped Regal Roller-Coaster "Feature Presentation" snipe. Which is cool. I always kind of liked it's campy-ness. I especially like the ghostly blue film strip we're riding on now. Is that supposed to be a subliminal suggestion that film is "dead"? I don't know, but it looks cool.
But then right after that snipe, which ends with the words "FEATURE PRESENTATION" on the screen, you're greeted with two more COMMERCIALS. And THEN, you have a line up of 6 or 7 TRAILERS. Then, finally, the feature starts about 15 minutes after the snipe that announced it.
Regal, I understand you may be a little confused on this. But this is NOT an effective line up. In fact it makes you look incompetent. You should probably either change that snipe to say "Your feature presentation will begin after the following previews" which is what you used to say, or print the feature presentation snipe on film so it can be put in the proper place in the line up, or ditch the roller coaster all together. That would be a shame though, because I actually think it's kind of cool.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard C. Wolfe
Master Film Handler
Posts: 250
From: Northampton, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 03-02-2011 01:46 PM
Please excuse me if I’m going a little off topic here. First, allow me to agree with those that state that if FEATURE PRESENTATION goes on the screen , it should be followed by the FEATURE and nothing else.
As we all know, it is the norm for distributors to place a trailer for their next feature in front of their current one. Even that should never be shown after the Feature Presentation snipe. Either splice the FP snipe between them or don’t show those trailers at all. I as a 2nd run theatre never show those trailers. That would be rather stupid to do as I often will never be playing that feature. It just confuses the patrons who then think that you will be playing it.
However, my main question here has to do with show makeup, trailer placement etc. with digital projection. Since I’m still using that antiquated, old fashioned, inadequate 35mm film, and am now pondering investing in and installing that new fangled filmless projection system called digital, I am wondering how it affects show makeup?
Running a historic single screen theater, I try very hard to continue my presentation in the traditional way it was always done “back in the day” when all theatres were single screen. I still use daters… such things as: Prevues of Coming Attractions, Our Next Attraction, Starts Friday etc., etc. I also show only one trailer, the next attraction, and no screen advertising of any sort. My question to those of you now well versed in the art of digital projection is: Can you get those daters in digital, and is it easy to place them wherever you want them to be, and mostly… if the feature comes with a trailer attached to the front, can you remove them so you don’t look stupid running a trailer after the Feature Presentation?
Last June I posted a question about whether I should at this time invest in digital projection or new seats. Most of you agreed with me that since I am a 2nd run theatre, new seating would benefit my theatre more than digital projection. I have since completed that project that included repainting the interior, refinishing the auditorium floor, replacing all the carpeting and installing 450 new Erwin seats. The following are links to pictures so you can see how it all turned out.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/59347695@N03/5432418537/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/59347695@N03/5432368251/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/59347695@N03/5432377905/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/59347695@N03/5432388505/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/59347695@N03/5433007506/
Now I’m seriously preparing for the digital conversion, but I want to be sure that I can continue to program my preshow as I have always done. If I can’t, I will stick with 35mm for a while longer and hope that the changes come to allow me to do that.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-02-2011 02:47 PM
Richard - you can still control your trailers and play any you want to in any order. The feature film is always completely separate from the "attached" trailer so you can play that trailer or not, it's your choice.
In fact, trailers are one of the best things about digital. I'm constantly tweaking our trailer mix depending on how busy we are, how many kids are in the crowd, etc. You get at least two hard drives full of trailers every week and you'll never be wanting for a trailer again. In fact, if anything there are too many trailers.
As for daters -- there is a company, Cinetize.com, that provides a pretty nice selection for free (or customizable for a reasonable fee). You can view all their samples from their website. The daters are nice, but I wish they were a little flashier in the sound department.
I keep hoping some of the "classic" companies like Filmack or Cinema Concepts might issue some of their daters digitally but it hasn't happened yet.
I do miss the Dolby "Train" trailer which we used to place ahead of the feature and continue to hope it'll come out on digital but it hasn't yet. Right now, I'm using the Technicolor Digital Cinema logo just ahead of the feature --it has good sound and really shows off the colors and brightness of the picture. If you don't want to do that, Cinetize has several "Feature presentation" logo clips. (Also free.)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|