|
|
Author
|
Topic: Summer 2014 is down, but Hollywood isn't worried about it (here's why)
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 07-08-2014 01:09 PM
Why Hollywood Isn't Sweating Summer Slump at Box Office
By Todd Cunningham on July 7, 2014 @ 10:39 am
The hits haven't hit the heights of “Iron Man 3,” but there hasn't been a megabudget bomb and even some high-profile underperformers will make money
quote: A feeble July 4 weekend has left the domestic box office down by nearly 20 percent from last season, but the sky isn't falling in Hollywood. As a matter of fact, most of the studios are doing just fine this summer.
No one likes to make less money, and this season's overall grosses are at $2.3 billion so far, down 19.3 percent from $2.8 billion over the same stretch last year, according to Rentrak. But there's not a lot of teeth gnashing and no one is panicking, and it's not a matter of ”what, me worry?”
The short story is that while no film has matched the $400 million success of “Iron Man 3,” there have been far more hits than misses. There also hasn't been a mega-budget bomb — last summer there were four – and some of the high-profile movies that have under-performed domestically will wind up in the black thanks to overseas returns.
Remember that last summer was the biggest in history with $4.8 billion in grosses, so it was always going to be a tough act to follow and the industry knew that. It was clear that this summer's biggest sequels were going to be hard-pressed to match the grosses of Tony Stark and his pals, “Man of Steel,” “Monsters University” and “Fast & Furious 6.”
There was one animated film with major potential –”How to Train Your Dragon 2” — instead of two in “Despicable Me 2” and “Monsters U.” And the summer's prospects took a major hit when Universal was forced to push “Fast & Furious 7” in the wake of Paul Walker‘s death.
“X-Men: Days of Future Past” ($227 million), “Maleficent” ($213 million) and “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” ($200 million) are the summer's biggest movies to date, and “Godzilla” ($197 million) and “Transformers: Age of Extinction” ($174 million and counting) are close. But their grosses don't compare with last year's leaders at the half-way point: “Iron Man 3” ($406 million), “Man of Steel” ($267 million), “Fast & Furious 6” ($235 million), “Star Trek Into Darkness ($222 million) and “Monsters University” ($210 million).
Fox is having a terrific summer that stands to get better this week when "Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” opens. It scored big-time with the teen drama “The Fault In Our Stars.” But while that film's $12 million budget makes its $112 million total all the more impressive, it doesn't raise the roof in terms of the overall box office.
With the success of “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” and “22 Jump Street,” Sony is a much better place than it was last summer when “After Earth” and “White House Down” were two of the season's biggest disappointments. The domestic total for Spidey was the lowest in franchise history and half of the “Iron Man 3” haul, but it has grossed more than $500 million overseas, second-best in the series.
Disney may not have “Iron Man 3” this summer, but “Maleficent” has been very strong, especially overseas, and it has Marvel's “Guardians of the Galaxy” coming on Aug. 1. Paramount has Michael Bay's morphing robots epic “Age of Extinction,” which will take a run at $1 billion in grosses worldwide, driven by its success overseas and especially in China. Universal has largely sat the summer out, but “Neighbors” was a pleasant surprise.
Warner Bros. has had a tougher time of it, with Adam Sandler‘s “Blended” and Clint Eastwood‘s “Jersey Boys” struggling, but things are hardly bleak.
Melissa McCarthy's R-rated “Tammy” may not have matched the opening grosses of her earlier hits “Identity Thief” or “The Heat,” but its budget didn't, either. The $20 million R-rated comedy will be profitable by the weekend and could still hit $80 million — or four times its budget, so financially it will be a win. Even the studio's pricey Tom Cruise sci-fi epic “Edge of Tomorrow” has chugged to $90 million domestically, and brought in $250 million from overseas. That may not put it in the black, but it's not a disaster.
“I think that the studios know better than anyone that this business is cyclical,” BoxOffice.com vice-president and senior analyst Phil Contrino told TheWrap. “I'm sure they are assuaging any panic with daydreams about how massive summer 2015 is going to be.”
The summer of 2015 is already jammed with Marvel's “The Avengers: Age of Ultron,” (May 15), “Jurassic World” (June 12), “The Terminator” reboot (July 1), “Despicable Me” spinoff “Minions” (July 10), The “Man of Steel” sequel (July 17) and a movie adaptation of the hugely popular video game, “Assassin's Creed” (Aug. 7). As “Captain America: Winter Soldier” did this year, ”Fast & Furious 7” will provide a preseason spark when it rolls out on April 3.
Article from The Wrap
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 07-12-2014 05:39 PM
If there is a lack of enthusiasm among the public, we haven't felt it here -- people are just as excited about the movies as ever. I had a little girl run up to me after the Transformers movie and holler, "That movie was SO AWESOME!!!"
However that said, we ARE down from last summer -- mostly because of the reasons cited in the article (no Iron Man, no Pixar, not as much animated fare, etc.) We are up from 2012, however.
To me it should be a sign to the studios that people are getting tired of the same old same old. How many ways can you show stuff getting destroyed? All these physics-free and no-logic movies seem like the same thing over and over. Especially when they not only keep making sequels, but reboots of series that aren't that old to begin with. How long until we have yet another Batman series launched by some new hotshot director?
The worst part of it all, is the media will now flow heavily with the doom and gloom stories and write nonsensical crap about the latest gimmick being used to "lure people back to the theaters" (as if nobody is going to the movies at all) when in reality all we need is movies that people really want to see.
Well that and maybe increasing the video window by about 8 or 9 months, but that's never going to happen.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|