|
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|
Author
|
Topic: Day and Date Update
|
Martin McCaffery
Film God
![](/ubbmembers/37a.jpg)
Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-09-2016 06:38 PM
The latest attempt to wipe out movie theaters for fun and profit: quote: Studios, Exhibitors Consider Revolutionary Plan for Day-and-Date Movies at Home (EXCLUSIVE)
Brent Lang Senior Film and Media Reporter @BrentALang
Studios, Exhibitors Consider Revolutionary Plan Day-and-Date
MARCH 9, 2016 | 03:41PM PT Tech moguls Sean Parker, Prem Akkaraju pitch industry on premium service offering $50 rentals of new releases
Five years ago, major studios attempts to offer first-run movies in the home months early set off a fierce standoff with theater owners.
Now, a startup backed by Sean Parker of Facebook and Napster fame is trying to encourage Hollywood studios and exhibitors to wade back into those controversial waters. Called the Screening Room, the company offers secure, anti-piracy technology that will offer new releases in the home on the same day they hit theaters, sources tell Variety.
Individuals briefed on the plan said Screening Room would charge about $150 for access to the set top box that transmits the movies and charge $50 per view. Consumers have a 48-hour window to view the film.
To get exhibitors on board, the company proposes cutting them in on a significant percentage of the revenue, as much as $20 of the fee. As an added incentive to theater owners, Screening Room is also offering customers who pay the $50 two free tickets to see the movie at a cinema of their choice. That way, exhibitors would get the added benefit of profiting from concession sales to those moviegoers.
Participating distributors would also get a cut of the $50 dollar per view proceeds, also believed to be 20%, before Screening Room took its own fee of 10%.
Representatives from the Screening Room have been pounding the pavement in recent months, meeting with all of the major studios and feeling out exhibitors, more than a half dozen industry insiders confirmed to Variety. Parker, who is the major investor in Screening Room, has tapped former Sony Pictures worldwide marketing and distribution chief Jeff Blake in an advisory capacity. He has been working on the project and has deep ties to both the exhibition and studio communities.
At the presentations, Screening Room officials have told studio executives that they are close to finalizing a deal with AMC, which is poised to be the world’s largest exhibitor if its acquisition of Carmike Cinemas is approved by regulators.
There is serious interest from several of the major studios, including Universal, Fox and Sony, people familiar with the matter say. Those studios are continuing to study the business plan and deal terms and remain engaged in discussions with Screening Room. However, many cautioned that the talks are still in the initial stages. For its part, Disney, does not appear to be interested in the plan.
One potential deterrent for distributors is that Screening Room is looking to be the exclusive content partner. This may give pause to studios like Universal, that makes movies available through parent company Comcast, or Sony, which has family ties to Playstation.
On the other hand, the company’s anti-piracy technology could be appealing to studios who struggle with global content theft. Major films can be widely available illegally on line in file-sharing sites within hours of their release.
However, some exhibitors worry that they would essentially be midwifing their demise by agreeing to shrink the windows–which continues to be a hot-button issue for theater owners. Regal, for example, has steadfastly refused to screen any films that do not agree to a standard, exclusive theatrical run of roughly 90 days. Box office hit record levels last year, crossing $11 billion for the first time in history. But attendance has been essentially flat in recent years.
Although a few studios, such as Paramount and Universal, have tried to cook up alternative distribution strategies in recent years, most distributors have been wary of upsetting exhibitors. Last fall, Paramount teamed with a few chains, such as AMC and Cineplex, AMC and Cineplex, on a plan that allowed them to release the pictures on home entertainment platforms 17 days after the number of theaters showing the films dipped below 300.
There have also been efforts to create technology that allows consumers to watch major studio films in the home. Prima Cinema’s, for instance, boasts a box that allows customers to screen new releases, but is priced at a much steeper, $35,000.
In addition to Parker, Prem Akkaraju serves as CEO of the company and its co-founder. He was previously a partner at the electronic music company SFX Entertainment and was a partner at InterMedia Partners. In addition, he worked at JP Morgan Entertainment Partners and Sanctuary Music Group.
Representatives for Screening Room declined comment, as did AMC and the major studios.
Variety
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Martin McCaffery
Film God
![](/ubbmembers/37a.jpg)
Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-09-2016 09:55 PM
Not totally sure what is going on, but since they seem to be making a deal with AMC here's what I think they are suggesting.
The distributors, for their cut of the $50 dollar fee, make the feature available to the Screening Room company for in home distribution day and date.
The exhibitor, AMC in this case, gets the exclusive rights to sell home viewing tickets as part of their deal when the book the film. They get $20 (or 20% if that's a typo) for every home view ticket they sell.
I'm guessing the only way this can work is for one exhibitor to have exclusive rights to selling the home tix, thus undercutting the competition who may have booked the film, but won't profit off of the home viewer. And that Screening Room doesn't sell tix while it is still on screen at the partner's theatre. Studio gets money no matter how tickets are sold, so they don't give a rats ass about the theatre.
Will viewing public pay $50 to watch a movie at home? If you have enough people, I guess it makes it worthwhile if you don't mind viewing at home.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 03-12-2016 05:17 AM
quote: David Buckley That's the plan; exhibition is an unnecessary step between production and monetization.
So, the long-term strategy here is to cut out those greedy bastards in the exhibition industry and replace them with 10-dollar a month subscription plans from the likes of Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, Google and Apple? Because you know, they're nice and totally not greedy at all...
I'm pretty sure this plan will never fly. Maybe they get the contracts all right, but then... crickets. Paying 50 bucks to see a movie at home just isn't happening. Yeah, you can share with friends, but like Bobby already mentioned, getting a bunch of people together and watch a movie at someone's home, while sharing the costs, how often does that ever happen? Maybe for a special, one-off happening, broadcasted live, but for a movie from "tape"?
For most people, going to see a movie in a proper movie theater is still something special. It's a night out or an impotant part of a night out. Something most people are willing to spend more money on than watching a movie at home. This is also where the beef is for all those studios, let's hope they don't forget it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|