my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » What is up with these showtimes

Author Topic: What is up with these showtimes Mike Croaro Master Film Handler Posts: 394 From: Millbrae, CA Registered: Apr 2005 posted 09-17-2017 06:05 PM                     Greetings, I found an old picture of the Hillsdale Cinema onlione. It is from the 60's. It depicts "The Games is Over" with Jane Fonda. Showtimes listed on marquee as 1:30, 3:28, 5:46, 7:54, 10:02. Are these typical 1960's showtimes? I posted the link to the picture below. Hope it works. Mike https://www.google.com/search?q=hillsdale+cinema+1960%27s&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjH0964qq3WAhXHx1QKHVwiAQ8Q_AUIDCgD&biw=1536&bih=758#imgrc=5z-EBDLTx_eXHM:&spf=1505689707080  |  IP: Logged Frank Cox Film God Posts: 2234 From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada Registered: Apr 2011 posted 09-17-2017 06:43 PM                        And they are "now open for 1pm matinee daily". So the matinee is 1pm and the next showtime is 1:30? Must be a very short matinee...  |  IP: Logged Kenneth Wuepper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1026 From: Saginaw, MI, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 09-17-2017 07:59 PM                     In the day of shorter length features, we would do 1 3 5 7 and 9 showings seven days of the week. Epic length and road show films were programmed accordingly.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-17-2017 08:14 PM                        Those times seem like a throwback to the days of continuous shows, where you would go in anytime and sit through until whatever you were seeing started to repeat. But then, I think they would say "Continuous shows starting at 2pm" or similar. So...an old fashioned showman who was slowly adapting?  |  IP: Logged Don Furr Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 509 From: Sun City, Ca USA Registered: Nov 2002 posted 09-17-2017 09:10 PM                     Most of our dollar theatres back in the 90's ran 5 shows daily during the summer or in the case of longer run times, 4 shows daily.  |  IP: Logged Mike Croaro Master Film Handler Posts: 394 From: Millbrae, CA Registered: Apr 2005 posted 09-17-2017 09:17 PM                     Hello Again, I don't think there anything strange about 5 showtimes. It's the odd times each movie starts. For example, instead of 3:28, 5:46, 7:54 and 10:02, why not 3:30, 5:45, 7:55, 10:00 so the showtimes are more "rounded".  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 09-17-2017 09:22 PM                        Shortage of the right digits for the marquee?  |  IP: Logged James Westbrook Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1133 From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa Registered: Mar 2006 posted 09-18-2017 01:22 PM                     The feature is 98 minutes long, and supposing the opening movie logo hit the screen at 1:30, the movie would be over at 3:08. Now it seems to be going into 20 minute intervals, with the next one at 3:28... I originally was thinking there may be something with the trailers in front of the program. Say there is 7 minutes in front...3:28 is when the trailers start and then the feature hits the screen at 3:35... But then the next show would start at 5:53...? These are indeed odd-ball times. Maybe it made sense to whoever did that 50 years ago...maybe...  |  IP: Logged Jason McMillan Film Handler Posts: 68 From: Houston, TX, USA Registered: Dec 2009 posted 09-18-2017 01:40 PM                     Back in the 90's there was a company called "Dollar Cinema Inc" here in Houston that specialized in sub-run venues. One of their theatres - the Parkview Twin in Pasadena, TX - always had these kind of oddball start times while none of their other cinemas did.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 09-22-2017 04:58 PM                     There were a lot of cinemas in those days that ran continuous without intermissions between shows. Thus, the mgr would post these odd show times when the show actually ends. Plus, in those days, there were no end credits. When the feature was over with, "the END", or "FIN" for the foreign films, would hit the screen. This is why one would see cue marks at the end of the feature so the operator can begin the next reel, being Reel One of the beginning of the feature. -Monte  |  IP: Logged Frank Cox Film God Posts: 2234 From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada Registered: Apr 2011 posted 09-22-2017 05:55 PM                        I've always thought that it was a much more sensible way to do things when they put the credits at the start of the movie instead of at the end. There's an incentive to keep them reasonably concise, people will actually see them and they'll mean something that way. Today's fifteen minute wall-of-text is being read by approximately no-one since everyone gets up and leaves as soon as the feature is over, and they're down the street and on their second beer by the time the credits get to the end. Even the efforts to incent people to sit through the credits by putting a "bonus scene" at the very end seem to be waste of time -- some people might sit there and wait, but nobody's paying any attention to the words on the screen.  |  IP: Logged Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 09-22-2017 06:39 PM                     The showtimes are very typical of the 60's, although usually if they advertised they would have rounded up to the nearest 5 minutes (those specific times WOULD have appeared on the printed schedule in the box office window and ticket box inside where the usher tore your tickets. The 1pm time given would have been when the box office actually opened OR when the program started (probably a short subject, cartoon and previews). typically, if there waa ANY break between shows, it would be limited to 5 minutes. But, yes, they didn't round up to the nearest 5 minutes in the actual scheduling, just for the actual start of the feature.  |  IP: Logged Dave Bird Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 777 From: Perth, Ontario, Canada Registered: Jun 2000 posted 09-23-2017 12:02 PM                        I was always tempted to not attach the reels that were "all credits". Certainly killed the lamp a time or two when the double or triple-feature ran late and I was tired. I don't think too many people read them either, though I would swear that something about still being "on screen" makes the lollygaggers lollygag just a bit longer...  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 09-23-2017 04:14 PM                     quote: Frank Cox Today's fifteen minute wall-of-text is being read by approximately no-one since everyone gets up and leaves as soon as the feature is over, and they're down the street and on their second beer by the time the credits get to the end. Even the efforts to incent people to sit through the credits by putting a "bonus scene" at the very end seem to be waste of time -- some people might sit there and wait, but nobody's paying any attention to the words on the screen. For the average moviegoer, those credits are obviously pure nonsense. Also, we've got IMDB and Wikipedia nowadays, you can look up the credits right there. Credits are part of the movie and parts of the movie going experience. As an exhibitor, you should honor them and obviously play them in full, at least if somebody is still watching. Today's big budget movie productions have so many people involved, that's why those credits have exploded in the last 20 or so years. And everybody needs to be listed, even the chaiwala of the Indian sweat shop that did a 3-second special effect shot. I think it's also in part to blame on the Unions who demand everybody to be credited. There's even a company, Scarlet Letters, which is responsible for many of those overly long credits. I guess they bill by the letter. Personally, I think those after-credits bonus featurettes are moronic. They might have been somewhat witty when they were "new", but really, cut the crap. If you have anything to tell me, do it DURING the movie, not when it's done.  |  IP: Logged Martin McCaffery Film God Posts: 2481 From: Montgomery, AL Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-23-2017 04:37 PM                        quote: Marcel Birgelen I think it's also in part to blame on the Unions who demand everybody to be credited. It's a business. And part of the business is to be able to have references, which, in this business is getting your names in the credits. In the studio system days, you worked for a studio, so didn't need to be listed in the credits. No you work for a film production company and need to be able to prove you worked on a film. Hard to "blame" the unions for that situation.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.