|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Author
|
Topic: Movies are WAY too loud!
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 01-29-2018 08:01 PM
Thomas - if you regularly go to IMAX cinemas, I am not surprised. They are known to play painfully loud, and usually they are under a policy to play according to IMAX specs.
I don't think you would notice the same tendency in other cinemas. Digital sound production and improved audio systems certainly allow cinema sound to play with higher dynamics, but not necessarily too loud.
I agree to that retired guy, that the occasional complaint is a good proof you are doing it right. We shouldn't always play on the soft side just by assuming a comfortable listening level. At least occasionally, also sensitive people have to get a little kick in cinema. No, I don't advise these levels for the romantic comedy. Just for those cases when a sensitive person accidentally turns up for an action or Scifi flic. If you don't get the occasional complaint in that scenario, you are doing something wrong.
In general, yes, aiming at a common sense dialog level will get you in the right ballpark. But then aim up from there, not down.
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 01-30-2018 01:57 AM
I'd say that on average across all movies being released, movies haven't really gotten much louder, but the usage of the surround channels has noticeably increased over the last years.
Also, the number of movies really pushing the envelope on what people can bear has also been increased.
Digital systems are extremely dynamic, so it should be possible to create a dialog on normal levels, intelligible for practically anyone, combined with bone-rattling explosions where needed. Unfortunately, not all sound mixes are living up to those standards.
I guess that one of the louder movies of last year was Blade Runner 2049. I personally liked it at "reference level", though I can imagine it was close to the edge or even over it for many and I'm not sure if I would play it at 7.0 at all occasions.
There are also movies which I consider defective in regards to their sound mix. One of them is Interstellar. I do know that Nolan considers "his" mix to be perfectly fine, but I think he needs to see a doctor. This movie features enormous loud scenes with a lot of muffled dialogue. If you play it at 7.0, you shatter people's ears and people are still unable to understand some of the dialogue in there. The director may claim that that's the way he intended it to be, but most people tend to appreciate the movie better when they can follow what people are saying, even when it doesn't really add anything to the plot. If people are not following the characters on screen, they're in the impression of missing out on something, a hard way to enjoy a movie.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 01-30-2018 09:19 AM
Agreed with Scott: dialogue intelligibility and absolute loudness are the two audio issues that customers tend to be most sensitive to (hence the reason My Name is Joe had to be shown in the US subtitled - audiences simply couldn't understand the thick Scottish accents!).
I wouldn't go as far as Woody Allen and Alfred Hitchcock (both of whom hate(d) multi-channel sound in the theater and refuse(d) to use it), but one advantage of the mono mix is that the mixer has a lot more control over what the audience hears, and therefore it is within his or her ability to make sure that the dialogue is intelligible. Creating a complex and engaging mono mix is not easy (watch/listen to I Am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang or The Wages of Fear if you don't believe me), though today's audiences are unlikely to recognize or understand the achievement.
With multi-channel mixes, there is so much that can go wrong at the theater end, over which the mixing and mastering personnel have no control, of which poor room tuning is at the top of the list.
The only times I've ever played modern 5.1 or 7.1 mixes at reference level were for studio premieres, when I was ordered to do so, at metaphorical gunpoint. Even among those invited audiences, there were always multiple complaints. Part of the problem is that these tracks are often normalized to way louder than DCI level (-20dBFS), presumably because the filmmaker wants the audience to experience uncomfortable loudness. I remember one such show - a documentary about Curt Cobain - in which, played at reference level, the words he was singing were clearly audible through the very thick, nitrate-certified booth wall, with all the booth monitor speakers totally off!
California law states that employees cannot be subjected to 92dB for more than eight minutes in every eight hours, without being given ear protection. If movies were all played at 7.0, every theater owner in the state would have to wear earmuffs, like the workers on airport ramps use, and issue them to their staff.
As for hearing changing with age, I seem to have bucked the trend: my higher frequency hearing has deteriorated over the last few years, and I've become more sensitive to lower frequency sounds. When playing the organ, I can barely hear 2' pitch stops now, especially when using them in a wide registration. Listening to recorded music at home, my wife complains that there's no bass, so much so that I've installed a subwoofer that is on when she's listening and powered down when I am.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 01-30-2018 12:14 PM
I don't know. Maybe I'm not visiting the "right" theaters or something because most of the time I find movie theater sound these days to have wimpy, under-powered sub-bass and dynamics toned-down everywhere else on the frequency range. Hell, it seems like any movie I see in a standard priced auditorium is running the sound at ordinary home TV speakers volume. Barely dynamic at all.
Depending on the auditorium's configuration I might hear some decent surround activity. But that, too, is a crap shoot lately. The theater may advertise Atmos, but a theater can go all over the damned map with how much or little it spends on amplifiers and other components to really make that format shine. There is no way to know if a theater that installed Atmos (or Auro, DTS-X, etc) did so on the cheap. And even if the theater has a fully tricked out Atmos rig the sound system is totally at the mercy of a movie's post production crew. It takes a lot of work to create a great quality Atmos mix and sound designers only seem to get stupidly short amounts of time to do their work. So we often get Atmos tracks that are Atmos in name only; they sound no different than an ordinary 5.1 mix.
IMAX-branded theaters can get uncomfortably loud (and harsh on the EQ side of things), but they seem to be the exception rather than the norm. The one here in Lawton doesn't play its movies nearly loud as it did when the Patriot 13 first opened. I've visited a few Dolby Cinema-branded theaters. None have been what I would consider to be painfully loud or show off dynamics that would startle viewers.
Maybe they're cranking the volume in other places. I don't know. But I still feel like we're a long way from the early 1990's era where 5.1 digital sound was a new, novel thing and film makers pushed the dynamics of sound mixes really hard. Moments in Jurassic Park, The Lion King and Fight Club would jolt the hell out of viewers, but it also depended on a theater having a powerful, well-EQ'ed sound system -like the GCC Northpark 1-2 in Dallas way back then. It has been a very long time since I've visited a commercial movie theater whose sound system could rumble the air in my chest. Modern stadium seated theaters just don't seem to have that kind of punch.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 01-30-2018 12:50 PM
Our 'typical' main feature level is 5.5 (AP20/old JBL THX speaker system, 460seat 'semi-wet' auditorium usually filled to 1/3 to 1/2 from the back). Typically, when I am in the auditorium watching the movie myself, I tend to push it up a bit, like 5.7 to 6 on my iPhone a few minutes into the movie. We strictly play preshow at 4.5. As many single screeners, we play a mix of mainstream/action and dialogue/arthouse features, so we deal with the full spectrum of audience expectations.
I played 'Blade Runner 2049' at 6.5, knowing that we would get 'some' complaints. But we also received some respect for it. Our sound system is certainly not up to todays standards, but everything works. I really enjoyed the massive Blade Runner 2049 sound track, wow...
I played SW8 at 6.5 in the opening night (those midnight nerds can stand it), and at 6 during the remaining engagement. Yes, some minor complaints after the movie, but nothing serious.
I am not ignorant towards complaints, but playing soft in order to get no complaints is like putting more and more sugar into your popper every day...
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 01-30-2018 06:20 PM
The theaters I go to are playing some movies too loud, IMO, but I think the problem is more the mix than the theater. As I've written before, I think that directors are insecure about their films and think they can create emotion by cranking up the volume. I think both in movies and in the record and concert business, just about everyone has forgotten what dynamic range is. When two characters in the film are having a quiet conversation and it sounds like they're yelling at you in the theater, there's a problem.
I've wondered whether my aging has caused me to be more sensitive or whether it's because I'm losing high frequencies, but then I realize that it's unlikely the theater sound system is putting out much above 10KHz anyway. I look around and see younger people holding their ears.
Unfortunately, I keep forgetting to bring a sound level meter with me to the theater, so I can get some real data and learn for sure whether it's me or the system.
I think part of the problem is that the levels in the theater are set for a full crowd and bodies absorb an incredible amount of sound. But these days, I more frequently wind up at movies during the day when the theaters are empty.
The other issue is that I've noticed that in spite of all the surround systems, the levels really fall off as I move back in the theater, especially in the few larger theaters that still exist. So what's too loud about a third way back from the screen is too low in the back rows.
And trailers are generally much louder than the feature. I thought Dolby had established some kind of voluntary standard for levels some decades ago. Maybe that went out the window with digital presentation .
I think it's ridiculous that with all the tech we have available today, theater sound sounded better to me back in the mag analog days. For the best sounding films, it used to take my breath away it was so good.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|