|
|
Author
|
Topic: Finally - a tablet that's big enough to be useful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 09-12-2018 06:51 PM
The layout and editing of a score make a huge difference as to how sight readable it is.
A lot of the stuff on free-scores.com is scans of editions published in the Victorian era and early c20 (obviously, because they're now out of copyright) - portrait format, and the notes are so closely spaced as to make sight reading at the composer's intended tempo very difficult. In those days, the cost of typesetting and printing was so high that an extra page could make the difference between it being viable to publish something and not. The scans of them available for free download all over the net are fine as an aide to memorizing, but I'd never want to try to sight read in real time for them, even if my sight reading was much better than it is. Some of them also have some bizarre fingering indications on them, which seem to assume that you have tiny hands. If you have larger ones, these indications can be a misleading distraction until you learn to ignore them.
There can also be actual content issues, too, especially in the case of pieces where multiple editions have resulted from musicologists differing as to the composer's intentions, autograph scores don't survive, etc. In the case of the version of BWV540 I pasted a bit of above, one of the three minor variations of the central C major section of the toccata is missing.
Many new scores are landscape format, with page breaks edited for playability, and no volume so thick that it won't sit flat on a stand or make the pages difficult to turn (e.g. the Peters Edition J.S. Bach organ works). For a pianist or organist with seriously good sight reading skills, they'd be viable for "live play." I did actually buy the Peters volume containing BWV540 after getting overly frustrated with the freebie online one. Debating whether to learn the fugue (which is totally boring and unremarkable, and which I don't really like), or make BWV542 my next project.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|