|
|
Author
|
Topic: AMC Theatres & False Advertising
|
Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 07-23-2019 02:11 PM
Yesterday, Monday, I went to see Lion King at the AMC in the Palisades Mall in West Nyack NY. Liked the film, the presentation was great, and I have always liked that theatre.
However, as a Stubs member, I qualify for AMC discount Tuesdays, which is $6 all day for Stubs members. However, the last trailer before the movie yesterday was for the various Stubs programs, that explicitly stated that the discount admission is $5 dollars. I don't know about the rest of the USA, but here in New Jersey and New York, advertising one price and charging a higher price is illegal. I was going to file a complaint with the NY attorney general's office today, but I decided to wait for my next trip to AMC to see if either they pull that promo, or correct the price.
The reason I am posting here is I was wondering if this is a nationwide AMC issue, or just this location. There was absolutely no management around to complain to, although I did let the teenage girl working the boxoffice of the problem.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 07-31-2019 12:09 PM
I think you're incorrect about the law. I know that in NYC, if a supermarket accidentally publishes the wrong price in a flyer, as long as they post the error in the store window or near a cash register, they don't have to give you that price.
And certainly the cable and phone carriers get away with murder concerning their advertised prices, which don't include fake fees and taxes. They imply the fees are government fees, but most are not.
When I used to have RCN for cable, they had the following "fees": OVS, PEG Access, Broadcast TV surcharge, Sports Surcharge, Entertainment Surcharge, Network Access & Maintenance Fee, Municipal Construction Surcharge (+ State and local sales taxes). The fees alone came to $48 a month when I finally got fed up with multiple price increases per year and dropped them.
Verizon FIOS has: PEG Grant, FIOS TV Broadcast, Regional Sports Network, Municipal Construction Surcharge, Video Franchise Fee, Regulatory Recovery Fee-Federal, NY State and Local Surcharge (+ state and local sales taxes). Their fees come to $24 a month.
AT&T's cell phone service has: Administrative Fee, Regulatory Cost Recovery Charge, County Gross Receipts Surcharge, Federal Universal Service Charge, MTA Telecom Surcharge, State Telecommunications Excise Surcharge, State Public Safety Commission Surcharge, County Public Safety Commission surcharge (+ sales taxes). Those fees and taxes come to $17 a month and most of them, including most of the ones that sound "governmental" are not - they're fake fees.
All of these companies advertise their prices without the fees and they get away with it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 08-01-2019 08:16 AM
My current scourge is hotel "facilities fees," which seem to be multiplying like rabbits at the moment. Hotels will insist that these fees cover things like Internet access and health facilities, but that the fees are non-optional. My own (strong) feeling is that non-optional fees should be part of the base price, not added on in order to manipulate Interenet price searches.
I spent a night at a hotel in NYC last fall. I had booked it through Priceline, to whom I payed the room rate and associated taxes. I was never informed of any additional charges. When I checked in, I was told that there would be a $30+ "facilities fee" that would be due upon check-out. I flat-out refused to pay it, on the basis that I was never informed of the fee, would have stayed elsewhere if I had been informed of it, and did not use the services that it supposedly covered. Eventually, the hotel clerk gave up and did not charge the fee. I fear that others may not be so lucky.
Afterwards, I wrote letters of complaint to the hotel (which did not respond), Priceline (which gave a glib and non-apologetic response), and the NY State Attorney General's office (which sent a surprisingly good response, thanking me for helping them to gather data about this growing problem).
Apparently, Las Vegas is the worst city for this sort of thing, but NYC is getting really bad, too. How long will it be before we see $1 room rates with $300 non-optional "facilities fees"?
The sad part is that the travel industry used to be about helping people to have happy, fun times. Now, most airlines, hotels, and rental car agencies don't even pretend to have any interest in this. They just want to separate people from their money in the most slimy way possible.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 08-04-2019 08:57 PM
quote: Scott Norwood Apparently, Las Vegas is the worst city for this sort of thing, but NYC is getting really bad, too.
The last time we were at CinemaCon, at Caesars Palace they had an optional $17 internet fee. My wife had brought a Verizon AirCard because she needed to use her computer for work. At the hotel, the AirCard was blocked and the only way she could get to the internet was to use their $17 service, which was none too fast. I always thought it was illegal to block cellular signals, but maybe those hubs are different.
It was a little tense at first because she works for a bank, which she had already jumped through quite a few hoops to get them to approve the AirCard for use during our trip, so they were none too pleased that she had to use a random hotel network. It took several phone calls back and forth to get it all sorted out between the hotel's IT people and the bank, but the situation finally got resolved. We still had to pay the 17 bucks a day.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|