|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: The Re-release of E. T.
|
Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999
|
posted 09-06-2000 02:16 PM
I just read that Spielberg is re-issuing E.T. in 2002. In the article (on the WebTV entertainment news pages) Spielberg is using additional footage and certain computer enhancements for this release. Is the movie not good enough as it is? I personally liked the film (In 70mm at the Columbia Theater in Atlanta) and see no way to improve it. Is it possible that this new version will qualify for a new copyright? In 1982, E.T. was playing all over Atlanta in many neighborhood theaters. The Columbia Theater (now gone) ran E.T. to a full house the night I saw it. The only seats available were in the BACK ROW of the balcony. It was an experience. Even in the back, the image was huge and sharp. A couple of former projectionists at the Columbia regularly lurk here. Maybe one day they will tell us about the huge Cinemeccanica 70mm projector that ran this and all the other 70 stuff. The Columbia ran: 2001, Sound Of Music, Dr. Zhivago, Oklahoma! And a host of others. We need more 70mm Productions!
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 09-06-2000 02:44 PM
For those few ( )who missed reading about the "Splendor of 70 mm", here are links to the articles I wrote a few years ago for Kodak's "Film Notes for Reel People": http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/newsletters/reel/december98/pppp.shtml http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/newsletters/reel/march99/pytlak.shtml Note that I mention the gorgeous 70 mm prints of "ET" (I recall they were 1.85:1 aspect ratio with masked sides). Unless the "certain computer enhancements" are done at greater than 2K resolution, they may not stand up to the greater sharpness and detail a 70 mm print can deliver. The added cost and time of rendering higher res CGI may be another reason fewer movies are being released with any 70 mm prints. IMHO, even a 35 mm release print would look better if the CGI were done at higher resolution rather than 2K. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gracia L. Babbidge
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 709
From: Bowdoin, Maine
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 09-09-2000 06:48 AM
I think it would be nifty to see E.T. get re-released... ^_^ It was the second film I had ever seen in a cinema. I went after school (OK, so I was in Kindergarten, and was 5 at the time), with my aunt, my cousin, and one of my cousin's friends. Even though I was an antsy kid that didn't sit still for much of anything, I sat in quiet awe watching that film. I couldn't tell anyone at what cinema I viewed it, only that it was in the Lewiston/Auburn area, and is no longer open, and that means that it could have been one of several different places! I even remember what the first film I saw in a cinema was - Annie. I am pretty sure that I saw that in Brunswick, at the old four screen (that at one point in time had been a two screen) cinema, that has been closed for almost five years now... Heh, my liking of that movie prompted my first theatre experience, as my parents decided to bring me to see a Maine State Music Theatre production of Annie... I couldn't say what the first film I ever saw at a drive-in was, it's all hazy and cloudy in the memory, I was only a toddler! I vaguely remember seeing Bambi and Song Of The South...and then proceeded to drive my parents nuts by singing "Zip-a-dee-doo-da"
...The things we remember... ~GLB
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
John Wilson
Film God
Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 09-11-2000 03:45 AM
It's interesting that they tried to fool people by putting 'This Boy's Life' on the trunks as it was well known even then that that was the working title for ET. (It's also the movie advertised on the marquee of the theatre as Zach Calligan walks up the main street in 'Gremlins').Paul, you've waited this long...wait to see it in a cinema. ...although I must say that I hate the way these guys are going back and altering original works...even if they did make them in the first place.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|