|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: The Incredible Shrinking Theatres
|
Ky Boyd
Hey I'm #23
Posts: 314
From: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-25-2001 05:53 PM
Looking at the movie listings in the Fri, May 25th SF. Chronicle, I observed the following:The 16 plex at BayFair mall has become an 8 plex The 25 plex at Union City has become a 10 plex The Jack London 9 is now a 5. The Hacienda 20 is now an 8 The Concord 14 is now a 6 The Pinole 10 is now a 5 The Crow Canyon 6 is now a twin The Festival 5 is now a triplex Century Park 12 is now a 6 plex and the 16 is now an 8 The 1000 Van Ness 14 is now also a 6 The Plaza 10 is a triplex The Metreon (15) is now a 6 plex And there are 13 prints of Pearl Harbor in Sonoma County and at least as many Shrek's. How have theatres in your area shrunk?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 05-25-2001 10:31 PM
It's multiple print city here in Columbus. For PEARL HARBOR alone, we have 13 prints at AMC, 5 at Regal, 6 at Marcus, 7 at Faux Cinemark, 1 at Star Cinemas, and one at a local independent single screen. That's 33 prints in central Ohio!Another local independent has in its ad: "This weekend, why bother with long lines, sell-outs and over crowded parking lots? That WWII flick will be around all summer. See a Four-Star film at the Drexel this week!" The local 24-plex has only 12 titles. The local 30-plex has 5 Pearl Harbor, 5 Shrek, 3 Knight's Tale, 2 Angel Eyes, and 4 Mummy Returns. Not much variety this weekend, that's for sure. Mark L.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Aaron Haney
Master Film Handler
Posts: 265
From: Cupertino, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 05-26-2001 12:13 AM
The Century 25 in Union City (near Oakland) only has 11 movies listed.EDIT: Oops, I didn't notice Ky had already listed this one in his original message; sorry for the repeat. And I was wrong, it's only 10, not 11.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.
Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 05-26-2001 03:00 AM
Detroit Metro area (including Ann Arbor):Just a quick run down the newspaper listing. This is by no means scientific ... 385 first run screens 237 screens not running a 2nd, 3rd or 4th print 61 prints of The Mummy Returns (15.8%) 82 prints of Pearl Harbor (21.3%) 78 prints of Shrek (20.3%) Most prints of a movie in a single complex: - Mummy: 4 - Pearl Harbor: 5 - Shrek: 4 Most impressive reductions in screen count: - Showcase Westland: 8 screens showing 3 movies - AMC Livonia: 20 screens showing 9 movies You can definitely expect these three titles in your stockings this Xmas.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 05-26-2001 07:48 AM
With all those prints being interlocked, I sure hope people know how to do it properly, and avoid print damage or dirt. I suspect some theatres that have no experience looping prints are going to try it for "Pearl Harbor" and "Shrek", and a few prints may get trashed.------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-26-2001 06:59 PM
We don't encourage interlocking in my neck of the woods. There are too many people who don't know how to do it right and too much film gets damaged. Furthermore, studios get pissy about it. Interlocking two houses means that one or more of the other prints doesn't get shown. Even if the print were to be booked to interlock, they still don't like it. Essentially, interlocking means that you magically enlarged the house. If that show doesn't sell out you are wasting space. It's much better to show two prints that start at different (staggered) times. That way you have a better chance of getting more people in each house. If you have a problem with an interlocked print you will potentially inconvenience more people. If you have two prints and one of your houses goes down you can offer them tickets to the next showtime. If there are two prints the customers will only have to wait for an hour or so. If there are more than two prints they will have to wait even less. If your projector goes down for more than one show and you don't interlock you can recover more easily by shuffling prints so your lowest grossing movie gets cancelled and the highest grossing movies just move to another house. If you interlock there is less chance of finding a combination of house placements that will keep your business intact until the problems can be solved. We DO have theatres that are allowed to interlock. Most often it is done for Saturday afternoon kid shows that run before the regularly sheduled showtimes. The people we allow to interlock are trained to do it right. Even then it is usually only one or two operators who are allowed to do it. If we have a U.B. who seems to be smart enough we will make sure he/she is brought up to speed before we turn him loose.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 05-28-2001 11:46 AM
When a theatre lists identical start times for more than one screen, or screens "disappear" in the listings, I suspect interlocking. If multiple prints are available, the start times are usually staggered.------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|